| [2025] FWC 205 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.365 - Application to deal with contraventions involving dismissal
Mr Michael O’regan
v
EOS Defence Systems Pty Limited
(C2024/9141)
| COMMISSIONER JOHNS | MELBOURNE, 22 JANUARY 2025 |
Application to deal with contraventions involving dismissal - whether the Applicant should be granted permission for representation
For the reasons explained in transcript on 21 January 2025, the Applicant is granted permission to be represented under section 596 of the Fair Work Act 2009.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR783542>
- AGLC
- Mr Michael O'regan v EOS Defence Systems Pty Limited [2025] FWC 205
- Case
- [2025] FWC 205
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether Mr O'regan should be allowed to be represented by a legal advocate during the proceedings. This decision hinges on whether the representation would be in the interest of justice and whether it aligns with the provisions of the Fair Work Act. The Commission had to consider the complexity of the case, the potential impact on Mr O'regan's ability to fairly present his case, and the likelihood that representation would expedite the resolution of the dispute.
The Fair Work Commission granted Mr O'regan permission to be represented, as outlined in the transcript of the hearing held on 21 January 2025. The decision was made based on the merits of the case, the necessity for representation to ensure a fair process, and the provisions of section 596 of the Fair Work Act. The Commission found that the representation would not only aid Mr O'regan in effectively presenting his case but also contribute to a just resolution of the dispute.
The final order of the Fair Work Commission was that Mr Michael O'regan is granted permission to be represented under section 596 of the Fair Work Act 2009. This decision enables Mr O'regan to proceed with the representation in his case against EOS Defence Systems Pty Limited, ensuring that his rights are adequately protected and that the proceedings are conducted fairly and efficiently.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.