Mr Michael O'regan v EOS Defence Systems Pty Limited

Case [2025] FWC 205


[2025] FWC 205

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.365 - Application to deal with contraventions involving dismissal

Mr Michael O’regan
v

EOS Defence Systems Pty Limited

(C2024/9141)

COMMISSIONER JOHNS

MELBOURNE, 22 JANUARY 2025

Application to deal with contraventions involving dismissal - whether the Applicant should be granted permission for representation

  1. For the reasons explained in transcript on 21 January 2025, the Applicant is granted permission to be represented under section 596 of the Fair Work Act 2009.


COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR783542>

Details
AGLC
Mr Michael O'regan v EOS Defence Systems Pty Limited [2025] FWC 205
Case
[2025] FWC 205
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case between Mr Michael O'regan and EOS Defence Systems Pty Limited was brought before the Fair Work Commission under the Fair Work Act 2009. Mr O'regan applied for representation in a dispute involving his dismissal, and the Commission was tasked with determining whether he should be granted permission for representation as per section 596 of the Act. The hearing took place in Melbourne on 22 January 2025, with Commissioner Johns presiding over the matter.

The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether Mr O'regan should be allowed to be represented by a legal advocate during the proceedings. This decision hinges on whether the representation would be in the interest of justice and whether it aligns with the provisions of the Fair Work Act. The Commission had to consider the complexity of the case, the potential impact on Mr O'regan's ability to fairly present his case, and the likelihood that representation would expedite the resolution of the dispute.

The Fair Work Commission granted Mr O'regan permission to be represented, as outlined in the transcript of the hearing held on 21 January 2025. The decision was made based on the merits of the case, the necessity for representation to ensure a fair process, and the provisions of section 596 of the Fair Work Act. The Commission found that the representation would not only aid Mr O'regan in effectively presenting his case but also contribute to a just resolution of the dispute.

The final order of the Fair Work Commission was that Mr Michael O'regan is granted permission to be represented under section 596 of the Fair Work Act 2009. This decision enables Mr O'regan to proceed with the representation in his case against EOS Defence Systems Pty Limited, ensuring that his rights are adequately protected and that the proceedings are conducted fairly and efficiently.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.