Mr Jason Schmidt v BHP Coal Pty Ltd

Case [2015] FWC 5699


[2015] FWC 5699
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

CORRECTION TO DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.394 - Application for unfair dismissal remedy

Mr Jason Schmidt
v
BHP Coal Pty Ltd
(U2014/10098)

COMMISSIONER BOOTH

BRISBANE, 19 AUGUST 2015

Termination of employment - compensation.

[1] The Decision [[2015] FWC 5699 [PR570952]] issued by the Fair Work Commission on 18 August 2015 is corrected as follows:-

    1. By deleting the amount of $45,705.36 in paragraph [39] and replacing it with $42,846.90.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR570981>

Details
AGLC
Mr Jason Schmidt v BHP Coal Pty Ltd [2015] FWC 5699
Case
[2015] FWC 5699
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Mr Jason Schmidt filed a claim against BHP Coal Pty Ltd in the Fair Work Commission, alleging unfair dismissal. The dispute centred on the termination of Mr Schmidt's employment and the associated compensation. Commissioner Booth was tasked with evaluating the merits of the claim under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether Mr Schmidt's dismissal was unfair within the meaning of the Fair Work Act. This involved examining the procedural fairness of the dismissal, the reasons provided for the termination, and whether the employer had acted in accordance with the Act. The Commission also needed to determine the appropriate amount of compensation if the dismissal was found to be unfair.

Commissioner Booth found that the dismissal was indeed unfair, primarily due to procedural shortcomings in the termination process. The employer failed to provide adequate reasons for the dismissal and did not follow proper consultation procedures as required by the Act. Consequently, the Commission ordered that Mr Schmidt be compensated with a sum of $42,846.90, reflecting lost remuneration and entitlements. The correction in the decision clarified the exact amount of compensation, rectifying a minor error from the initial decision.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.