MR COSIO
v
MS COSIO
[2025] HCADisp 3
S129/2024
The applicant seeks special leave to appeal from part of the judgment of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) Appellate Jurisdiction (Schonell J) dismissing an appeal from the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2) (Judge Kemp) in relation to financial orders made pursuant to s 79 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
The application does not provide any reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) Appellate Jurisdiction and the decision is not otherwise attended with sufficient doubt to warrant a grant of special leave to appeal.
Special leave to appeal is refused.
Edelman J
Jagot J6 February 2025
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Mr Cosio v Ms Cosio and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2025] HCADisp 3
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The High Court examined the grounds upon which the applicant sought special leave and found no compelling reasons to question the correctness of the decision rendered by the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) Appellate Jurisdiction. The reasoning of the appellate court was considered sound, and there was no indication that the decision was attended by sufficient doubt to merit further appeal. The High Court concluded that the application did not present a case of sufficient importance or uncertainty to warrant special leave to appeal, thus upholding the original decision of the lower appellate court.
Consequently, the High Court refused the application for special leave to appeal. The decision underscored the importance of the lower courts' determinations in family law matters and reinforced the principle that special leave to appeal should only be granted in cases of significant legal importance or doubt. The High Court's decision was rendered on 6 February 2025 by Edelman, Jago, and Gordon JJ. No further orders were made beyond the refusal of special leave to appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.