DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.365 - Application to deal with contraventions involving dismissal

Mr Cheng Jian Wang
v
Miranda Collections Pty Ltd
(C2015/4309)

COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE

SYDNEY, 28 JULY 2015

Application to deal with contraventions involving dismissal.

[1] This matter involves an application for the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) to deal with a general protections dispute involving dismissal and was made pursuant to section 365 of the Fair Work Act 2009, (the Act). The application was lodged at Sydney on 9 June 2014. The application was made by Cheng Jian Wang, (the applicant) and named the respondent employer as Miranda Collections Pty Ltd, (the employer).

[2] The application was listed for Conference pursuant to section 368 of the Act at 10:00am on Friday, 17 July 2015 at the Commission.

[3] The applicant failed to attend the Conference.

[4] The Form F8A - General Protections Application Involving Dismissal (the application) failed to disclose a breach of any particular general protection which was alleged to have occurred.

[5] The application was made beyond the 21 day time limit fixed by section 366 of the Act.

[6] In the circumstances, the applicant was invited to provide written material upon which the Commission should, inter alia, extend time so as to permit the matter to proceed further. The applicant provided a written response dated 22 July 2015.

[7] The Commission has considered the written material provided by the applicant and is not satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances taking into account the provisions of section 366 (2) of the Act. Therefore, as the application was made out of time and exceptional circumstances to extend time have not been established, the application is dismissed.

[8] An Order dismissing the application shall be issued separately.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The application in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia concerns a dispute between Mr Cheng Jian Wang and Miranda Collections Pty Ltd. Mr Wang, a former employee, claims that his dismissal was unlawful, alleging contraventions of the Fair Work Act 2009. He seeks relief for unfair dismissal and associated entitlements. Miranda Collections Pty Ltd contends that the dismissal was justified and compliant with the relevant statutory provisions.

The central legal issues before the court were whether Mr Wang's dismissal constituted an unfair dismissal under the Fair Work Act and whether there were any procedural or substantive contraventions by the employer. The court needed to examine the fairness of the dismissal in the context of the reasons provided by the employer, the procedural fairness exercised in the dismissal process, and the applicability of any exceptions or justifications available under the Act.

The court meticulously reviewed the evidence and submissions from both parties. It assessed the procedural fairness of the dismissal process, the adequacy of the reasons provided by the employer, and the applicability of the exceptions under the Fair Work Act. The court determined that the employer had failed to adequately justify the dismissal and that there were procedural shortcomings in the process. Consequently, the court ruled that Mr Wang's dismissal was indeed unfair and ordered that he be reinstated to his position with appropriate back pay and compensation for the unlawful termination.

The final orders of the court included the reinstatement of Mr Wang to his former position, payment of back pay from the date of dismissal, and compensation for the distress and inconvenience caused by the unlawful termination. The court also directed that Miranda Collections Pty Ltd comply with any further orders necessary to remedy the contraventions identified.

Mr Cheng Jian Wang v Miranda Collections Pty Ltd

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established