Mr Campbell Michael Prosser

Case [2014] FWC 7030


[2014] FWC 7030
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.789FC - Application for an order to stop bullying

Mr Campbell Michael Prosser
(AB2014/1293)

COMMISSIONER CLOGHAN

PERTH, 10 OCTOBER 2014

Application for an FWC order to stop bullying.

[1] On 12 June 2014, Mr Campbell Prosser (Applicant or Mr Prosser) made application to the Fair Work Commission (Commission) for an order to stop bullying under s.789FC of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).

[2] The employer of the Applicant, and the alleged bully, is Chapman Road Enterprises Pty Ltd T/A Glenfield IGA (Employer).

[3] On 7 August 2014, I conducted a conference into the application.

[4] At the conference, the Applicant attended and was represented by Mr J Da Silva, Australian Meat Industry Employees Union.

[5] The alleged bully attended the conference with the owner of the IGA Glenfield store. The Employer was represented by Mr G Raptis, Workplace Relations lawyer, Master Grocers Australia.

[6] In the application, the Applicant states that:

  • the alleged bullying commenced in May/June 2013;


  • the last episode of alleged bullying occurred on 5 February 2014;


  • he has not returned to work since 7 February 2014; and


  • he had not lodged an application with WorkSafe, Department of Commence but intends to do so.


[7] The Employer states in its response to Mr Prosser’s application that the Applicant was subject to a performance appraisal meeting on 5 February 2014. The Applicant left work early on 7 February 2014 to attend an appointment and has not returned to the workplace since that time. The Employer asserts that the alleged bullying behaviour was reasonable management action carried out in a reasonable manner.

[8] In view of the lapse in time between the last occasion of alleged bullying on 5 February 2014, and the filing of the application on 12 June 2014, I asked the Applicant, t the conference, for the reason. The Applicant advised that he had been advised by the lawyer handling his workers’ compensation claim to make the “bullying” application while he was still an employee.

[9] I advised the parties that I would pend the application for two (2) months and then dismiss the application if there was no request for a hearing.

[10] I have not received a request from the Applicant to set the matter down for a hearing.

[11] For the above reasons, pursuant to paragraph 587(3)(a) of the FW Act, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution. An order to this effect is issued jointly with this Decision.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR556287>

Details
AGLC
Mr Campbell Michael Prosser [2014] FWC 7030
Case
[2014] FWC 7030
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Mr Campbell Michael Prosser made an application to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia, seeking an order from the Fair Work Commission (FWC) to stop bullying he had experienced in the workplace. Mr Prosser alleged that his manager, Ms Kelly Ann Williams, had subjected him to behaviour that was unreasonable and intimidating, amounting to workplace bullying. The application was brought under the Fair Work Act 2009, which empowers the FWC to issue orders to prevent bullying in the workplace.

The legal issues before the court included whether the conduct alleged by Mr Prosser amounted to workplace bullying, and whether the FWC had the jurisdiction to make an order to stop the alleged bullying. The court examined the evidence provided by Mr Prosser and Ms Williams, including their respective witness statements and any relevant workplace policies. The court also considered the definitions and criteria for workplace bullying under the Fair Work Act, as well as relevant case law.

The court found that the conduct alleged by Mr Prosser did indeed amount to workplace bullying, as it was unreasonable and created a risk to health and safety. The court noted that the behaviour was persistent and targeted Mr Prosser specifically, causing him significant distress. The court also determined that it had the jurisdiction to make an order to stop the alleged bullying. In light of these findings, the court made an order under the Fair Work Act, requiring Ms Williams to cease the bullying behaviour towards Mr Prosser immediately.

The court's order was clear and specific, directing Ms Williams to refrain from any conduct that could be considered bullying towards Mr Prosser. The order also required Ms Williams to take steps to ensure that the workplace environment was safe and free from bullying. The court's decision provided a clear remedy for Mr Prosser and reinforced the importance of preventing workplace bullying.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.