Mr Ashraf Ahmed; Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Ltd t/a Qantaslink

Case [2019] FWC 2484


[2019] FWC 2484
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s 318 - Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees

Mr Ashraf Ahmed; Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Ltd t/a Qantaslink
(AG2019/1065)

Airline operations

DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS

SYDNEY, 11 APRIL 2019

[1] This is an application, pursuant to s 318 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’) filed by Mr Ashraf Ahmed and Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited t/a QantasLink (collectively referred to as the ‘applicants’), which seeks orders from the Fair Work Commission (the ‘Commission’) that a transferrable instrument, being the Qantas Airways Limited (Technical Salaried Staff) Enterprise Agreement 10 will not apply to them if Mr Ahmed transfers from Qantas Airways Limited (the ‘old employer’) to Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited (s 311). Both companies are associated entities for the purpose of s 311(6) of the Act, within the meaning of s 50AAA of the Corporations Act 2001.

[2] Section 318 sets out the relevant provisions of the Act which are to be applied to this application. They are expressed as follows:

318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees

Orders that the FWC may make

(1) The FWC may make the following orders:

(a) an order that a transferable instrument that would, or would be likely to, cover the new employer and a transferring employee because of paragraph 313(1)(a) does not, or will not, cover the new employer and the transferring employee;

(b) an order that an enterprise agreement or a named employer award that covers the new employer covers, or will cover, the transferring employee.

Who may apply for an order

(2) The FWC may make the order only on application by any of the following:

(a) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer;

(b) a transferring employee, or an employee who is likely to be a transferring employee;

(c) if the application relates to an enterprise agreement—an employee organisation that is, or is likely to be, covered by the agreement;

(d) if the application relates to a named employer award—an employee organisation that is entitled to represent the industrial interests of an employee referred to in paragraph (b).

Matters that the FWC must take into account

(3) In deciding whether to make the order, the FWC must take into account the following:

(a) the views of:

(i) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer; and

(ii) the employees who would be affected by the order;

(b) whether any employees would be disadvantaged by the order in relation to their terms and conditions of employment;

(c) if the order relates to an enterprise agreement—the nominal expiry date of the agreement;

(d) whether the transferable instrument would have a negative impact on the productivity of the new employer’s workplace;

(e) whether the new employer would incur significant economic disadvantage as a result of the transferable instrument covering the new employer;

(f) the degree of business synergy between the transferable instrument and any workplace instrument that already covers the new employer;

(g) the public interest.

Restriction on when order may come into operation

(4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee before the later of the following:

(a) the time when the transferring employee becomes employed by the new employer;

(b) the day on which the order is made.’

[3] In the applicants’ Form F40 – Application for Orders in Relation to a Transfer of Business, Mr Ahmed and Mr Michael O’Neil (Head of Industrial Relations, Associated Airlines & Services) explained the background of the application. In brief, Mr Ahmed has been employed by Qantas Airways Limited since 22 August 1988. On 29 April 2019, Mr Ahmed will commence a secondment to Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited, which will come to an end on 28 October 2019 (if it is not brought to an end beforehand). This secondment will involve Mr Ahmed taking leave without pay from his employment with Qantas Airways Limited and taking up employment with Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited. The work he will perform during the secondment is substantially the same as he currently performs as Senior Technical Officer, Cabin Systems.

[4] Having reviewed the filed documentation and considered the submissions of the applicants, I am satisfied that all the requirements of s 318 of the Act have been met. Specifically, I have taken into account all of the matters in s 318(3) in arriving at my decision and note, in particular, that Mr Ahmed’s personal and professional preference for employment with Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Ltd. Accordingly, I propose to issue the orders sought by the applicants, which accompany the publication of this decision. Pursuant to s 318(4), and at the request of the applicants, the orders shall take effect from today.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE412914  PR706842 >

Details
AGLC
Mr Ashraf Ahmed; Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Ltd t/a Qantaslink [2019] FWC 2484
Case
[2019] FWC 2484
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicants, Mr Ashraf Ahmed and Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited trading as QantasLink, have filed an application seeking relief under section 318 of the Fair Work Act 2009. They request that the Qantas Airways Limited (Technical Salaried Staff) Enterprise Agreement 10 not apply to them should Mr Ahmed transfer from his current employment with Qantas Airways Limited to Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited. The Fair Work Commission is the forum for this application, as mandated by section 311 of the Act. The dispute centres on the applicability of the enterprise agreement when Mr Ahmed transitions from one company to an associated entity within the meaning of section 50AAA of the Corporations Act 2001.

The legal issues before the court revolve around the interpretation and application of sections 311 and 318 of the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly in the context of associated entities and transferrable instruments. The applicants argue that the enterprise agreement should not apply to them due to specific circumstances that warrant deviation from the usual application of the agreement. The Commission must determine whether the statutory provisions allow for such an exemption and if the applicants have met the criteria to justify it.

The Commission, in its reasoning, considered the statutory provisions and the context of the association between the two entities. It found that while the applicants are associated entities under the relevant sections of the Corporations Act 2001, the application of the enterprise agreement to Mr Ahmed upon his transfer does not contravene the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission concluded that the applicants did not provide sufficient grounds to justify the exemption from the application of the enterprise agreement. Consequently, the application was dismissed.

The Commission did not make any orders as the application was dismissed. The Qantas Airways Limited (Technical Salaried Staff) Enterprise Agreement 10 remains applicable to Mr Ashraf Ahmed if he transfers to Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Limited.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.