Mr Adam Fitzpatrick v Crawford Metal Group Pty Ltd T/A ESM Manufacturing Group

Case

[2013] FWC 6522

4 SEPTEMBER 2013

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2013] FWC 6522

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

AND

REASONS FOR DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.394 - Application for unfair dismissal remedy

Mr Adam Fitzpatrick
v
Crawford Metal Group Pty Ltd T/A ESM Manufacturing Group
(U2013/8950)

COMMISSIONER CLOGHAN

PERTH, 4 SEPTEMBER 2013

Application for relief from unfair dismissal.

[1] On 26 April 2013, Mr Adam Fitzpatrick (Applicant) made application to the Fair Work Commission (Commission) seeking a remedy for alleged unfair dismissal from Crawford Metal Group Pty Ltd T/A ESM Manufacturing Group (Employer).

[2] The application is made pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).

[3] The application was unable to be resolved at conciliation and was referred to me for arbitration on 23 May 2013.

[4] In response to the application, the Employer asserts that:

    ● it is a small business employer and the Applicant has not completed the minimum employment period of one (1) year.

[5] The application was the subject of a conference on 5 July 2013 to discuss the Employer’s jurisdictional objection. The application remained unresolved.

[6] To assist in the efficient and effective resolution of the Employer’s jurisdictional objection, I issued procedural directions on 9 July 2013.

[7] The Applicant did not comply with directions due on 24 July and 21 August 2013.

[8] The Employer complied with directions due on 24 July 2013.

[9] On 23 August 2013, I wrote to the Applicant setting out his lack of compliance with the procedural directions and seeking compliance. I also enquired as to whether he intended pursuing his application.

[10] In my correspondence of 23 August 2013, I also advised the Applicant that should I not receive any communication from the Applicant by 30 August 2013, I intended to dismiss his application in accordance with paragraph 399A(1)(b) of the FW Act.

[11] No communication was received from the Applicant.

[12] For the above reasons, and in accordance with paragraph 399A(1)(b) of the FW Act, the application is dismissed. An order to this effect is issued jointly with this Decision and Reasons for Decision.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR541210>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0