FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| MOSS & MOSS | [2015] FCCA 2237 |
| Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – Application for interim spousal maintenance – finding that wife not able to adequately support herself – finding that husband not reasonably able to maintain wife – application dismissed. |
| Legislation: Family Law Act 1975, ss.72, 75(2), 77 |
| In the marriage of Bevan & Bevan MD (1995) FLC 92-600 Bane & Bayley [2013] FCCA 1581 |
| Applicant: | MS MOSS |
| Respondent: | MR MOSS |
| File Number: | MLC 6004 of 2012 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Jones |
| Hearing dates: | 15 July & 3 August 2015 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 3 August 2015 |
| Delivered at: | Melbourne |
| Delivered on: | 27 August 2015 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr Stavris |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Anthonys Solicitors |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Mr Serra |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Berger Kordos Lawyers |
ORDERS
The wife’s Application in a Case filed on 25 February 2014 be dismissed.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Moss & Moss is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT MELBOURNE |
MLC 6004 of 2012
| MS MOSS |
Applicant
And
| MR MOSS |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
This decision concerns an application by Ms Moss (“the wife”) for orders that Mr Moss (“the husband”) pay her interim spousal maintenance in the sum of $600 a week. This interim decision is made in the context of substantive property proceedings which are listed for final hearing on 28 April 2016.
The husband seeks an order dismissing the wife’s application for interim spousal maintenance.
Background
The wife is 50 years of age (born on (omitted) 1964) and presently is a full-time student working limited hours in a (employer omitted). The husband is 54 years of age (born (omitted) 1961) and works full time as a (occupation omitted).
There are two children of the relationship:
a)X born (omitted) 1997 (“X”) who is 18 years of age and is in year 11 at (omitted) Special School. X has special needs having been diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder when he was around two and a half years old;
b)Y born (omitted) 1999 (“Y”) who is 16 years of age and is in year 9 at (omitted) College.
(Collectively “the children”)
The parties married on (omitted) 1995 and separated on 7 March 2012. Final Parenting orders were made by consent on 2 December 2013 which provided for the children to spend time with the parents on a week about…
Continue reading MOSS & MOSS
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Moss and Moss [2015] FCCA 2237
- Case
- [2015] FCCA 2237
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the wife's application, filed on 25 February 2014, should be dismissed. The court was required to determine the merits of this application for dismissal.
Judge Jones ordered that the wife's application be dismissed. No further reasoning or legal principles applied are evident from the provided text.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The wife’s Application in a Case filed on 25 February 2014 be dismissed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.