IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA )
)
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY ) No. NG 731 of 1994
)
GENERAL DIVISION )
BETWEEN:IAN DAVID MORWOOD & ANOR
Applicant
AND:CHEMDATA PTY LIMITED & ORS
Respondent
24 MARCH 1995
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
LOCKHART J.
This is a case in which Mr Morwood, the first applicant, had initially sought to represent himself and the company, the second applicant, of which he is a director and shareholder.
At my suggestion on the last occasion, the matter was adjourned so that steps might be taken through the Registry for the New South Wales Bar Association and the Law Society of New South Wales possibly to make arrangements to give certain advice with respect to pleadings and affidavits and general conduct of the matter, though not appear nor act for the applicants.
Both bodies have assisted and the result is that counsel has appeared today as amicus curiae, as have their instructing solicitors for the applicants or at least Mr Morgan, and they have indicated they propose to assist in the preparation of a statement of claim. I think the course that has been taken by the professional bodies and counsel and solicitors is very commendable and I propose to adjourn the matter to 13 April next.
On the question of costs, this is the fourth occasion the matter has been in for directions and the respondents seek an order for costs of the day. I understand why that application is made but in view of the fact that the adjournment was directed to a large extent by the Court to assist the applicants, the respondents and the Court to have legal minds preparing the real issues in the case on behalf of the applicants, I think in the circumstances the Court should order that costs of today be reserved and similarly with respect to the previous occasions when the matter has been in the list for mention. I make that order.
I certify that this and the preceding one (1) pages are a true copy of the reasons for judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Lockhart.
Associate
Dated: 24 March 1995
Counsel for the Applicants : J. L. B. Allsop
(appearing amicus curiae) : P. R. Whitford
Solicitors for the Applicants : Blake Dawson Waldron
(appearing amicus curiae) :
Counsel for the Respondents : M. R. Ellicott
L. Dunlop
Solicitors for the Respondents: Allen Allen & Hemsley
Date of Hearing : 24 March 19945
Date of Judgment : 24 March 1995
- AGLC
- Morwood, I.D. v Chemdata Pty Ltd [1995] FCA 220
- Case
- [1995] FCA 220
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in this case involved the applicants' initial representation of themselves and the need for legal advice in preparing a statement of claim. The court considered the role of the professional bodies and counsel in assisting the applicants and decided to adjourn the matter to allow for further preparation. Additionally, the court addressed the issue of costs, reserving costs for the day and previous occasions when the matter had been in the list for mention, given the assistance provided by the professional bodies and counsel.
The court commended the professional bodies and counsel for their commendable course of action in assisting the applicants. The matter was adjourned to 13 April for further preparation. The court also made an order reserving costs for the day and previous occasions, given the assistance provided by the professional bodies and counsel.
No further orders were made in the judgment.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.