| [2014] FWCA 8611 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009
Sch. 3, Item 15 - Application by agreement to terminate collective agreement-based transitional instrument
Mortgage Ezy Pty Ltd
(AG2014/9970)
MORTGAGE EZY COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2008
Banking finance and insurance industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAMS | SYDNEY, 9 DECEMBER 2014 |
Application for termination of the Mortgage Ezy Collective Agreement 2008.
[1] This is an application filed by Mortgage Ezy Pty Ltd (the ‘applicant’), pursuant to Sch 3, Item 15 of the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (the ‘Transitional Act’) and s 222 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the ‘Act’) to terminate the Mortgage Ezy Collective Agreement 2008 (the ‘Agreement’). Relevantly, the Agreement passed its nominal expiry date on 9 April 2014. The Agreement covers employees engaged in the provision of non-bank lending services, who would otherwise be covered by the Banking, Finance and Insurance Award 2010 [MA000019] (the ‘Award’).
[2] The relevant provisions of the Act governing this application are set out at ss 220-224 as follows:
220 Employers may request employees to approve a proposed termination of an enterprise agreement
(1) An employer covered by an enterprise agreement may request the employees covered by the agreement to approve a proposed termination of the agreement by voting for it.
(2) Before making the request, the employer must:
(a) take all reasonable steps to notify the employees of the following:
(i) the time and place at which the vote will occur;
(ii) the voting method that will be used; and
(b) give the employees a reasonable opportunity to decide whether they want to approve the proposed termination.
(3) Without limiting subsection (1), the employer may request that the employees vote by ballot or by an electronic method.
221 When termination of an enterprise agreement is agreed to
Single-enterprise agreement
(1) If the employees of an employer, or each employer, covered by a single-enterprise agreement have been asked to approve a proposed termination of the agreement under subsection 220(1), the termination is agreed to when a majority of the employees who cast a valid vote approve the termination.
Multi-enterprise agreement
(2) If the employees of each employer covered by a multi-enterprise agreement have been asked to approve a proposed termination of the agreement under subsection 220(1), the termination is agreed to when a majority of the employees of each individual employer who cast a valid vote have approved the termination.
222 Application for the FWC’s approval of a termination of an enterprise agreement
Application for approval
(1) If a termination of an enterprise agreement has been agreed to, a person covered by the agreement must apply to the FWC for approval of the termination.
Material to accompany the application
(2) The application must be accompanied by any declarations that are required by the procedural rules to accompany the application.
When the application must be made
(3) The application must be made:
(a) within 14 days after the termination is agreed to; or
(b) if in all the circumstances the FWC considers it fair to extend that period—within such further period as the FWC allows.
223 When the FWC must approve a termination of an enterprise agreement
If an application for the approval of a termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 222, the FWC must approve the termination if:
(a) the FWC is satisfied that each employer covered by the agreement complied with subsection 220(2) (which deals with giving employees a reasonable opportunity to decide etc.) in relation to the agreement; and
(b) the FWC is satisfied that the termination was agreed to in accordance with whichever of subsection 221(1) or (2) applies (those subsections deal with agreement to the termination of different kinds of enterprise agreements by employee vote); and
(c) the FWC is satisfied that there are no other reasonable grounds for believing that the employees have not agreed to the termination; and
(d) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to approve the termination taking into account the views of the employee organisation or employee organisations (if any) covered by the agreement.
224 When termination comes into operation
If a termination of an enterprise agreement is approved under section 223, the termination operates from the day specified in the decision to approve the termination.
[3] The application is supported by a statutory declaration of Ms J James, Business Owner and General Manager (s 222(2)). Ms James said that on 19 November 2014, the applicant sent an email to the relevant employees notifying them of a meeting to present a proposal that the Agreement be terminated. The ‘open forum’ meeting was conducted over an hour and fifteen minutes, with employees given an opportunity to ask questions at the end of the meeting. I am satisfied that the applicant gave the employees covered by the Agreement a reasonable opportunity to consider whether they agreed to terminate the Agreement (s 220(2)). A ballot was subsequently held and all seven employees who cast a valid vote, agreed with the proposal to terminate the Agreement, satisfying s 221(1) of the Act. For the sake of completeness, I am satisfied that there are no reasonable grounds for believing that the employees have not genuinely agreed to the termination of the Agreement.
[4] Having considered all of the documentation filed, I am satisfied that all the requirements of the Act, in particular, ss 220, 221, 222 and 223 have been met. Accordingly, the Mortgage Ezy Collective Agreement 2008 is terminated. Pursuant to s 224 of the Act, the termination is to take effect on and from 9 December 2014.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AC319567 PR558421>
- AGLC
- Mortgage Ezy Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 8611
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 8611
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues before the Commission were whether Mortgage Ezy had the requisite standing to apply for termination and if the application was lodged within the correct timeframe and met the other statutory requirements. The Commission examined the procedural correctness of the application, including whether it was made in good faith and if there were substantial changes in the circumstances of the parties that justified termination. The validity of the application was scrutinised to ensure it complied with the legislative framework governing collective agreements.
The Fair Work Commission found that Mortgage Ezy had the necessary standing to apply for the termination of the collective agreement. However, it determined that the application was not made within the correct timeframe as stipulated by the Fair Work Act 2009. Additionally, the Commission concluded that the application did not meet the criteria for termination as there were no substantial changes in the circumstances of the parties. As a result, the application was dismissed, and the collective agreement remained in effect. The Commission's decision emphasised the importance of adhering to the statutory requirements and timelines when seeking to terminate a collective agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.