QUEENSLAND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
CITATION: | Morrison v Simon Blackwood (Workers' Compensation Regulator) [2015] QIRC 146 |
PARTIES: | Morrison, Miranda v Simon Blackwood (Workers' Compensation Regulator) |
CASE NO: | WC/2014/347 |
PROCEEDING: | Appeal against decision of the Workers' Compensation Regulator |
DELIVERED ON: | 7 August 2015 |
HEARING DATES: | 16, 17 March 2015 |
MEMBER: | Deputy President Swan |
ORDERS : | 1. The Appeal is dismissed. 2. The Appellant is to pay the Respondent's costs of and incidental to the Appeal. |
| CATCHWORDS: | WORKERS' COMPENSATION - APPEAL AGAINST DECISION - decision of Simon Blackwood (Workers' Compensation Regulator) - whether right inguinal hernia arose out of or in the course of employment - appellant bears onus of proof |
| CASES: | Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 |
| APPEARANCES: | Ms S. Anderson, of Counsel instructed by Shine Lawyers for the Appellant. |
Decision
Ms Miranda Morrison (the Appellant) has appealed the decision of the Workers' Compensation Regulator of 10 November 2014, which confirmed the WorkCover decision to reject Ms Morrison's notice of claim for damages in accordance with s 32 and s 258(1)(a) of the Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (the Act).
This is a hearing de novo and the Appellant bears the onus of proof on the balance of probabilities.
Witnesses
Witnesses called by the Appellant were:
· Ms Miranda Morrison, worker;
· Dr Robert Parkes, Consultant General Physician.
Witnesses for the Respondent were:
· Ms Anna-Marie Donaghue, Registered Nurse, worker's supervisor;
· Professor Michael O'Rourke, General Surgeon.
Relevant Legislation
Section 32 of the WCRA defines "injury" as:
"32 Meaning of injury
1)An injury is personal injury arising out of, or in the course of, employment if -
a)for an injury other than a psychiatric or psychological disorder - the employment is a significant contributing factor to the injury; or
b)for a psychiatric or psychological disorder - the employment is the major significant contributing factor to the injury.
2)However, employment need not be a contributing factor to the injury if section 34(2) or 35(2) applies.
3)Injury includes the following -
a) a disease contracted in the course of employment, whether at or away from the place of employment, if the employment is a significant contributing factor to the disease;
b) an aggravation of the following, if the aggravation arises out of or in the course of, employment and the employment is a significant contributing factor to the aggravation;
(i)a personal injury other than a psychiatric or psychological disorder:
(ii)a disease;
(iii)a medical condition other than a psychiatric or psychological disorder, if the condition becomes a personal injury or disease because of the aggravation;
ba)an aggravation of a psychiatric or psychological disorder, if the aggravation arises out of, or…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Morrison v Simon Blackwood (Workers' Compensation Regulator) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2015] QIRC 146
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether the hernia arose out of or in the course of Morrison's employment. The court had to determine whether Morrison had discharged his onus of proving that the hernia was work-related. This involved examining the evidence and whether it established a causal link between the hernia and the employment activities.
The court found that Morrison failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish a causal link between his hernia and his employment. It was determined that Morrison had not discharged his onus of proving the hernia arose out of or in the course of his employment. The appeal was dismissed, and Morrison was ordered to pay the Workers' Compensation Regulator's costs of and incidental to the appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The Appeal is dismissed.
2. The Appellant is to pay the Respondent's costs of and incidental to the Appeal.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.