Morrison v Simon Blackwood (Workers' Compensation Regulator)

Link copied
Case Copied 19 min read

QUEENSLAND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

CITATION:        

Morrison v Simon Blackwood (Workers' Compensation Regulator) [2015] QIRC 146

PARTIES:  

Morrison, Miranda
(Appellant)

v

Simon Blackwood (Workers' Compensation Regulator)
(Respondent)

CASE NO:

WC/2014/347

PROCEEDING:

Appeal against decision of the Workers' Compensation Regulator

DELIVERED ON:

7 August 2015

HEARING DATES: 

16, 17 March 2015
15 April 2015 (Appellant Submissions)
1 May 2015 (Respondent Submissions)
11 May 2015 (Submissions in Reply)

MEMBER:

Deputy President Swan

ORDERS   :

1.      The Appeal is dismissed.

2.      The Appellant is to pay the Respondent's costs of and incidental to the Appeal.

CATCHWORDS:

WORKERS' COMPENSATION - APPEAL AGAINST DECISION - decision of Simon Blackwood (Workers' Compensation Regulator) - whether right inguinal hernia arose out of or in the course of employment - appellant bears onus of proof

CASES:

Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003
Thorsten Groos and WorkCover Queensland (2000) 165 QGIG 106, 107
Saleed v Simon Blackwood (Workers' Compensation Regulator) [2015] QIRC 028
Davidson v Simon Blackwood (Workers' Compensation Regulator) (2014) ICQ 008

APPEARANCES:

Ms S. Anderson, of Counsel instructed by Shine Lawyers for the Appellant.
Mr S. Gray, Counsel directly instructed by Simon Blackwood (Workers' Compensation Regulator).

Decision

  1. Ms Miranda Morrison (the Appellant) has appealed the decision of the Workers' Compensation Regulator of 10 November 2014, which confirmed the WorkCover decision to reject Ms Morrison's notice of claim for damages in accordance with s 32 and s 258(1)(a) of the Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (the Act).

  2. This is a hearing de novo and the Appellant bears the onus of proof on the balance of probabilities.

Witnesses

  1. Witnesses called by the Appellant were:

    ·        Ms Miranda Morrison, worker;

    ·        Dr Robert Parkes, Consultant General Physician.

  2. Witnesses for the Respondent were:

·        Ms Anna-Marie Donaghue, Registered Nurse, worker's supervisor;

·        Professor Michael O'Rourke, General Surgeon.

Relevant Legislation

  1. Section 32 of the WCRA defines "injury" as:

"32    Meaning of injury

1)An injury is personal injury arising out of, or in the course of, employment if -

a)for an injury other than a psychiatric or psychological disorder - the employment is a significant contributing factor to the injury; or

b)for a psychiatric or psychological disorder - the employment is the major significant contributing factor to the injury.

2)However, employment need not be a contributing factor to the injury if section 34(2) or 35(2) applies.

3)Injury includes the following -

a)   a disease contracted in the course of employment, whether at or away from the place of employment, if the employment is a significant contributing factor to the disease;

b)   an aggravation of the following, if the aggravation arises out of or in the course of, employment and the employment is a significant contributing factor to the aggravation;

(i)a personal injury other than a psychiatric or psychological disorder:

(ii)a disease;

(iii)a medical condition other than a psychiatric or psychological disorder, if the condition becomes a personal injury or disease because of the aggravation;

ba)an aggravation of a psychiatric or psychological disorder, if the aggravation arises out of, or…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Morrison v Simon Blackwood (Workers' Compensation Regulator) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2015] QIRC 146
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Morrison appealed against a decision by the Workers' Compensation Regulator, Simon Blackwood, who found that Morrison's right inguinal hernia did not arise out of or in the course of his employment. The dispute was heard and dismissed by the Supreme Court of Victoria.

The central legal issue was whether the hernia arose out of or in the course of Morrison's employment. The court had to determine whether Morrison had discharged his onus of proving that the hernia was work-related. This involved examining the evidence and whether it established a causal link between the hernia and the employment activities.

The court found that Morrison failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish a causal link between his hernia and his employment. It was determined that Morrison had not discharged his onus of proving the hernia arose out of or in the course of his employment. The appeal was dismissed, and Morrison was ordered to pay the Workers' Compensation Regulator's costs of and incidental to the appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The Appeal is dismissed.

2. The Appellant is to pay the Respondent's costs of and incidental to the Appeal.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.