Administrative
Appeals
Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2003] AATA 339
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL ) No N1999/1597
) N2001/153
VETERANS' APPEAL DIVISION ) Re Thomas Robertson Monteith Applicant
And
Repatriation Commission
Respondent
DECISION
Tribunal Ms S M Bullock, Senior Member
Dr M E C Thorpe, MemberDate11 April 2003
PlaceSydney
Decision Pursuant to section 43 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 the Administrative Appeals Tribunal decides to:
(i) Set aside the decisions under review in relation to chronic airflow limitation, diabetes mellitus, post traumatic stress disorder with alcohol dependence and substitute its decision that the conditions of chronic airflow limitation and alcohol dependence are war-caused and Disability Pension for these conditions is payable with effect from and including 11 April 1997. The condition of diabetes mellitus is war-caused with effect from and including 21 September 1999. The condition of hypertension is war-caused with Disability Pension being payable from and including 17 June 1997.
(ii) The decision under review in relation to post traumatic stress disorder is affirmed.
...............................................
Ms S M Bullock
Presiding Member
DECISION (CORRIGENDUM)
Before : Ms S M Bullock – Senior Member
Dr MEC Thorpe – MemberDate: 6 June 2003
Place: Sydney
The Tribunal made a decision in this matter dated 11 April 2003 pursuant to section 43 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (“the Act”).
It has come to the Tribunal’s attention that the Tribunal omitted to make reference in the decision to assessment of Disability Pension.
The Tribunal desires to amend the decision pursuant to section 43AA of the Act and provides as follows:
A. Page 1 and 2
Decision:“Pursuant to section 43 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 the Administrative Appeals Tribunal decides to:
(i)Set aside the decisions under review in relation to chronic airflow limitation, diabetes mellitus, post traumatic stress disorder with alcohol dependence and substitute its decision that the conditions of chronic airflow limitation and alcohol dependence are war-caused and Disability Pension for these conditions is payable with effect from and including 11 April 1997. The condition of diabetes mellitus is war-caused with effect from and including 21 September 1999. The condition of hypertension is war-caused with Disability Pension being payable from and including 17 June 1997.
(ii)The assessment of all accepted war-caused disabilities is remitted to the Repatriation Commission.
(iii)The decision under review in relation to post traumatic stress disorder is affirmed.”
B. Paragraph 196, page 85
“196. In conclusion, for all of the reasons set out above and considering all of the evidence, the Tribunal decides pursuant to section 43 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 to:
(i)Set aside the decisions under review in relation to chronic airflow limitation, diabetes mellitus, post traumatic stress disorder with alcohol dependence and substitute its decision that the conditions of chronic airflow limitation and alcohol dependence are war-caused and Disability Pension for these conditions is payable with effect from and including 11 April 1997. The condition of diabetes mellitus is war-caused with effect from…
Continue reading Monteith and Repatriation
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Monteith and Repatriation [2003] AATA 339
- Case
- [2003] AATA 339
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Tribunal examined the medical evidence and the veteran's service records to ascertain if the conditions were reasonably attributable to his service. For chronic airflow limitation and alcohol dependence, the Tribunal concluded that the evidence supported a finding that these conditions were war-caused. The Tribunal found that the veteran had served in a role where exposure to environmental hazards and stress were significant, which reasonably led to the onset of these conditions. Regarding diabetes mellitus, the Tribunal determined that the condition was war-caused from a later date when the veteran's medical history provided clear evidence linking the condition to his service. The Tribunal upheld the original decision concerning post traumatic stress disorder but found that the condition of hypertension was also war-caused from a specific date based on the service records and medical evidence.
The Tribunal set aside the original decisions concerning chronic airflow limitation, diabetes mellitus, post traumatic stress disorder with alcohol dependence and substituted its own decisions. The Tribunal affirmed the original decision concerning post traumatic stress disorder but found that chronic airflow limitation and alcohol dependence were war-caused with effect from specific dates, and diabetes mellitus was war-caused from a later date. Hypertension was also found to be war-caused from a particular date, with the pension being payable from that date. The Tribunal's decisions provide clarity on the entitlements of the veteran for these specific conditions, ensuring that he receives appropriate compensation for the conditions determined to be caused by his service.
Orders
Orders of the court
Pursuant to section 43 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 the Administrative Appeals Tribunal decides to:
(i) Set aside the decisions under review in relation to chronic airflow limitation, diabetes mellitus, post traumatic stress disorder with alcohol dependence and substitute its decision that the conditions of chronic airflow limitation and alcohol dependence are war-caused and Disability Pension for these conditions is payable with effect from and including 11 April 1997. The condition of diabetes mellitus is war-caused with effect from and including 21 September 1999. The condition of hypertension is war-caused with Disability Pension being payable from and including 17 June 1997.
(ii) The decision under review in relation to post traumatic stress disorder is affirmed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.