Mondelez Australia Pty Ltd T/A Mondelez/Cadbury

Case

[2021] FWCA 3117

31 MAY 2021

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2021] FWCA 3117
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.225 - Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

Mondelez Australia Pty Ltd T/A Mondelez/Cadbury
(AG2021/5178)

MONDELEZ AUSTRALIA PTY LTD RINGWOOD AND SCORESBY ELECTRICIANS CONFECTIONERY OPERATIONS VICTORIA AGREEMENT 2017

Manufacturing and associated industries

COMMISSIONER CIRKOVIC

MELBOURNE, 31 MAY 2021

Application for termination of the Mondelez Australia Pty Ltd Ringwood and Scoresby Electricians Confectionery Operations Victoria Agreement 2017.

[1] Mondelez Australia Pty Ltd T/A Mondelez/Cadbury (the Applicant) has applied, pursuant to s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act), to terminate the Mondelez Australia Pty Ltd Ringwood and Scoresby Electricians Confectionery Operations Victoria Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The Agreement has passed its nominal expiry date of 31 December 2020 and the Applicant is the employer covered by the Agreement.

[2] Section 225 of the Act provides as follows:

225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:

(a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

(b) an employee covered by the agreement;

(c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.”

[3] Section 225 of the Act provides as follows:

226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement

If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and

(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:

(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and

(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.”

[4] The statutory declaration filed by the Applicant (signed 17 May 2021) declared that there are no employees still covered by the Agreement, or likely to be covered by the Agreement in the future.

[5] Pursuant to s.183 of the Act, the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU/the Union) are covered by the Agreement.

[6] On 20 May 2021, my chambers emailed the CEPU seeking their views on the termination application and gave them until 25 May 2021 to respond. Chambers has not received any response to indicate that the CEPU have any issues they wish to raise.

[7] Based on the material contained in the statutory declaration of Mr Michael Asmar filed with the application, I am satisfied that termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest. Taking into account all of the circumstances including those in s.226(b)(i) and (ii), I consider that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement.

[8] The termination is effective from today.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE428847  PR730311>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0