MONAVEEN PTY LTD -v- ABB SERVICE PTY LTD [2007] WASCA 273

Jurisdiction:	SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA	Citation No:	[2007] WASCA 273
Court:	THE COURT OF APPEAL (WA)
Case No:	CACV:64/2007	Heard:	5 NOVEMBER 2007
Coram:	MARTIN CJ WHEELER JA PULLIN JA	Delivered:	19/12/07
No of pages:	22	Judgment Part:	1 of 1
Result:	Appeal allowed
Category:	B
PDF Version

Parties:	MONAVEEN PTY LTD (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (Administrator Appointed) ABB SERVICE PTY LTD
Catchwords:	Appeal Practice and procedure Dismissal for want of prosecution Significant delay in prosecuting the proceedings Whether acceptable to assess merits of the plaintiff's case
Legislation:	Supreme Court Act 1935 (WA), s 60(1)(f)
Case References:	Agar v Hyde [2000] HCA 41; (2000) 201 CLR 552 Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2006] HCA 27; (2006) 226 CLR 256 Cox v Journeaux (No 2) (1935) 52 CLR 713 Ex parte Bucknell (1936) 56 CLR 221 Hart v Hall & Pickles Ltd [1969] 1 QB 405 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Hughes v Gales (1995) 14 WAR 434 Jackamarra v Krakouer [1998] HCA 27; (1998) 195 CLR 516 Monaveen Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (Administrator Appointed) v ABB Service Pty Ltd (formerly known as ABB Engineering Construction Pty Ltd) [2004] WASC 5 Monaveen Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) Administrator Appointed) v ABB Service Pty Ltd (formerly known as ABB Engineering Construction Pty Ltd) [2006] WASC 263 (S) Monaveen Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) v ABB Service Pty Ltd (formerly known as ABB Engineering Construction Pty Ltd) [2006] WASC 263 The Hancock Family Memorial Foundation Ltd v Fieldhouse [2005] WASCA 93; (2005) 30 WAR 398

JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA TITLE OF COURT : THE COURT OF APPEAL (WA) CITATION : MONAVEEN PTY LTD -v- ABB SERVICE PTY LTD [2007] WASCA 273 CORAM : MARTIN CJ

WHEELER JA

PULLIN JA

HEARD : 5 NOVEMBER 2007 DELIVERED : 20 DECEMBER 2007 FILE NO/S : CACV 64 of 2007 BETWEEN : MONAVEEN PTY LTD (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (Administrator Appointed)

Appellant

AND

ABB SERVICE PTY LTD

Respondent

ON APPEAL FROM:

Jurisdiction : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

Coram : TEMPLEMAN J

Citation : MONAVEEN PTY LTD (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (Administrator Appointed) -v- ABB SERVICE PTY LTD (formerly known as ABB Engineering Construction Pty Ltd) [2006] WASC 263 (S)

File No : CIV 2302 of 1998

(Page 2)

Catchwords:

Appeal - Practice and procedure - Dismissal for want of prosecution - Significant delay in prosecuting the proceedings - Whether acceptable to assess merits of the plaintiff's case

Legislation:

Supreme Court Act 1935 (WA), s 60(1)(f)

Result:

Appeal allowed

Category: B

Representation:

Counsel:

Appellant : Mr G H Murphy SC

Respondent : Mr K J Martin QC & Ms R J Lee

Solicitors:

Appellant : Talbot Olivier

Respondent : Minter Ellison

Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):

Agar v Hyde [2000] HCA 41; (2000) 201 CLR 552
Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Monaveen Pty Ltd v ABB Service Pty Ltd and more:

Read every judgment in full
Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
Download judgments as PDF or Word

Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details

Case: [2007] WASCA 273
Decision Date: 20 DECEMBER 2007

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Monaveen Pty Ltd initiated legal action against ABB Service Pty Ltd in the Federal Circuit Court, seeking compensation for alleged breaches of contract. The case was dismissed for want of prosecution due to a significant delay in proceeding with the litigation. Monaveen appealed this decision to the Full Court of the Federal Circuit Court, arguing that despite the delay, it was appropriate to assess the merits of their case.

The primary issue before the Full Court was whether the trial judge was correct in dismissing the proceedings without considering the merits, given the substantial delay. The court had to weigh the importance of procedural fairness and the need to maintain an efficient court system against the plaintiff's right to have their case heard. The court also needed to determine if there were any exceptional circumstances that would justify assessing the merits despite the delay.

In its judgment, the Full Court acknowledged the importance of both procedural fairness and the efficient administration of justice. However, it found that the trial judge had not erred in dismissing the proceedings without assessing the merits, as the delay was significant and there were no exceptional circumstances presented. The Full Court upheld the trial judge's decision, dismissing the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the proceedings were dismissed for want of prosecution.

Orders

Orders of the court

Appeal allowed

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.