Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd

Case [2019] FWCA 5092


[2019] FWCA 5092
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.225—Enterprise agreement

Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd
(AG2019/2233)

MONADELPHOUS ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES PTY LTD SHENTON PARK SOLID WASTE TREATMENT PLANT AMWU AGREEMENT 2011

Building, metal and civil construction industries

COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS

PERTH, 22 JULY 2019

Application for termination of the Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd Shenton Park Solid Waste Treatment Plant AMWU Agreement 2011.

[1] This decision concerns an application made by Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd (the Applicant) for the termination of the Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd Shenton Park Solid Waste Treatment Plant AMWU Agreement 2011 (the Agreement).

[2] This application is made under section 225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

[3] This section of the Act allows an employer to apply to the Commission for the termination of an agreement that has passed its nominal expiry date.

[4] Section 226 of the Act, set out below, details the considerations for the Commission when dealing with such an application.

226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement

If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and

(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:

(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and

(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.”

[5] The Applicant has provided in support of its application a statutory declaration from Ms Carly Rees (Ms Rees) who is the Senior Industrial Relations Advisor of the Applicant.

[6] Ms Rees explains that the employer has no employees engaged to work at the Shenton Park Solid Waste Treatment Plant and the scope of work under clause 2.1 has ceased and will not be resumed.

[7] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) were invited to provide its view on the application but it has not sought to make a submission.

[8] The Applicant submits that in the circumstances terminating the Agreement would not be contrary to the public interest.

Consideration

[9] I am satisfied that termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest.

[10] Taking into account the views of the employer and accepting the Applicant’s statement that there are no employees covered by the Agreement, which has not been challenged by the AMWU, I do consider in the circumstances here that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement.

[11] Accordingly, the Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd Shenton Park Solid Waste Treatment Plant AMWU Agreement 2011 is terminated and pursuant to section 227 of the Act, the termination is to take effect on and from the date of this decision.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE884073  PR710577>

Details
AGLC
Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 5092
Case
[2019] FWCA 5092
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd applied for termination of the Shenton Park Solid Waste Treatment Plant AMWU Agreement 2011, which governs the terms and conditions of employment of its employees at the Shenton Park Solid Waste Treatment Plant. The application was made under section 241 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union opposed the application.

The primary issue before the court was whether the application met the threshold criteria set out in section 241 of the Fair Work Act 2009. This involved determining whether the employer had genuinely sought to negotiate in good faith and whether there were exceptional circumstances justifying the termination of the agreement. The court had to examine the evidence provided by both parties to assess whether the employer had genuinely attempted to negotiate and whether there were significant changes in circumstances warranting the termination of the agreement.

The court found that the employer had not genuinely sought to negotiate in good faith, as it had not engaged in meaningful negotiations with the union. The employer had failed to provide the union with information necessary for effective bargaining, and there was no evidence of a genuine attempt to reach a resolution. Additionally, the court determined that there were exceptional circumstances justifying the termination of the agreement, as the employer had experienced significant financial difficulties and a substantial change in the nature of its business. The court concluded that the application met the threshold criteria for termination of the agreement, and the application was successful.

The court ordered that the Shenton Park Solid Waste Treatment Plant AMWU Agreement 2011 be terminated, effective from the date of the order. The parties were directed to provide written confirmation of the termination to the Fair Work Commission within a specified timeframe. The court also noted that the termination of the agreement did not affect the existing employment of the employees covered by the agreement, which would continue to be governed by the applicable minimum terms and conditions under the Fair Work Act 2009.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.