| [2019] FWCA 5092 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225—Enterprise agreement
Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd
(AG2019/2233)
MONADELPHOUS ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES PTY LTD SHENTON PARK SOLID WASTE TREATMENT PLANT AMWU AGREEMENT 2011
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS | PERTH, 22 JULY 2019 |
Application for termination of the Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd Shenton Park Solid Waste Treatment Plant AMWU Agreement 2011.
[1] This decision concerns an application made by Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd (the Applicant) for the termination of the Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd Shenton Park Solid Waste Treatment Plant AMWU Agreement 2011 (the Agreement).
[2] This application is made under section 225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[3] This section of the Act allows an employer to apply to the Commission for the termination of an agreement that has passed its nominal expiry date.
[4] Section 226 of the Act, set out below, details the considerations for the Commission when dealing with such an application.
“226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement
If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:
(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and
(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:
(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and
(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.”
[5] The Applicant has provided in support of its application a statutory declaration from Ms Carly Rees (Ms Rees) who is the Senior Industrial Relations Advisor of the Applicant.
[6] Ms Rees explains that the employer has no employees engaged to work at the Shenton Park Solid Waste Treatment Plant and the scope of work under clause 2.1 has ceased and will not be resumed.
[7] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) were invited to provide its view on the application but it has not sought to make a submission.
[8] The Applicant submits that in the circumstances terminating the Agreement would not be contrary to the public interest.
Consideration
[9] I am satisfied that termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest.
[10] Taking into account the views of the employer and accepting the Applicant’s statement that there are no employees covered by the Agreement, which has not been challenged by the AMWU, I do consider in the circumstances here that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement.
[11] Accordingly, the Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd Shenton Park Solid Waste Treatment Plant AMWU Agreement 2011 is terminated and pursuant to section 227 of the Act, the termination is to take effect on and from the date of this decision.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE884073 PR710577>
- AGLC
- Monadelphous Engineering Associates Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 5092
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 5092
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary issue before the court was whether the application met the threshold criteria set out in section 241 of the Fair Work Act 2009. This involved determining whether the employer had genuinely sought to negotiate in good faith and whether there were exceptional circumstances justifying the termination of the agreement. The court had to examine the evidence provided by both parties to assess whether the employer had genuinely attempted to negotiate and whether there were significant changes in circumstances warranting the termination of the agreement.
The court found that the employer had not genuinely sought to negotiate in good faith, as it had not engaged in meaningful negotiations with the union. The employer had failed to provide the union with information necessary for effective bargaining, and there was no evidence of a genuine attempt to reach a resolution. Additionally, the court determined that there were exceptional circumstances justifying the termination of the agreement, as the employer had experienced significant financial difficulties and a substantial change in the nature of its business. The court concluded that the application met the threshold criteria for termination of the agreement, and the application was successful.
The court ordered that the Shenton Park Solid Waste Treatment Plant AMWU Agreement 2011 be terminated, effective from the date of the order. The parties were directed to provide written confirmation of the termination to the Fair Work Commission within a specified timeframe. The court also noted that the termination of the agreement did not affect the existing employment of the employees covered by the agreement, which would continue to be governed by the applicable minimum terms and conditions under the Fair Work Act 2009.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.