Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Moini Pty Limited v Inner West Council [2025] NSWLEC 1729 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 23 September 2025 Date of orders: 17 October 2025 Decision date: 17 October 2025 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O’Neill C Decision: The Court orders that:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) The Applicant is to pay the Respondent’s costs thrown away as a result of the amendment of the application, pursuant to
s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act1979 (NSW), in the agreed amount of $5,000 within 28 days of these orders.(3) Development Application No. 2024/0694, as amended, for partial demolition of the existing structures and construction of a new mixed-use retail and co-living housing development containing 104 co-living rooms, ground floor retail premises and a basement level, at 45-57 Parramatta Road, Annandale, is determined by the grant of consent, subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure A.
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION — mixed use retail and co-living housing development — conciliation conference — agreement between the parties — orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), s 8.7
Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW), s 34
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021 (NSW), s 38
Inner West Local Environmental Plan 2022, cll 4.4, 4.6, 5.10, 6.2, 6.9, 6.13
State Environmental Planning Policy (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021, Ch 6, ss 6.1, 6.6
State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing) 2021, ss 67, 68, 69
State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021, s 4.6
State Environmental Planning Policy (Transport and Infrastructure) 2021, ss 2.119, 2.122
Cases Cited: Cumming v Cumberland Council (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 117
Four2Five Pty Ltd v Ashfield Council [2015] NSWLEC 90
Initial Action Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council (2018) 236 LGERA 256; [2018] NSWLEC 118
Wehbe v Pittwater Council (2007) 156 LGERA 446; [2007] NSWLEC 827
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Moini Pty Limited (Applicant)
Inner West Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
A Pickles SC (Applicant)
T To (Respondent)
Mills Oakley (Applicant)
Inner West Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2024/360872 Publication restriction: Nil
JUDGMENT
-
COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to the provisions of s 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) (EPA Act) against the refusal of Development Application No. 2024/0694 for partial demolition of the existing structures and construction of a new mixed-use retail and co-living housing development containing 104 co-living rooms, ground floor retail premises and a basement level (the proposal), at 45-57 Parramatta Road, Annandale (the site), by Inner West Council (the Council).
-
The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) (LEC Act) between the parties, which was held on 23 September 2025. I presided over the conciliation conference. At the conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties. Under
s 34(3) of the LEC Act, I must dispose of the proceedings…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Moini Pty Limited v Inner West Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2025] NSWLEC 1729
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the amendment to the development application was permissible under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) and whether the amended application met the criteria for granting consent. The court needed to consider the procedural aspects of the amendment and the merits of the amended application, including its compliance with the relevant planning instruments and the impact on the local community.
The court found that the amendment to the development application was valid, as it was made within the statutory time frame and did not alter the fundamental nature of the proposal. The court further determined that the amended application met the necessary criteria for approval, including compliance with the local environmental plan and the provision of adequate infrastructure. The court concluded that the development would not significantly harm the character of the area or adversely affect neighbouring properties. Consequently, the court upheld the appeal and granted the amended development application, subject to specific conditions to mitigate potential impacts on the environment and community.
In addition to granting the development application, the court ordered that the applicant pay the respondent’s costs incurred due to the amendment of the application. This payment was to be made within 28 days of the court’s orders, in the agreed amount of $5,000. The court’s decision also detailed the conditions of consent for the approved development, which are outlined in Annexure A.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders that:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) The Applicant is to pay the Respondent’s costs thrown away as a result of the amendment of the application, pursuant to
s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), in the agreed amount of $5,000 within 28 days of these orders.
(3) Development Application No. 2024/0694, as amended, for partial demolition of the existing structures and construction of a new mixed-use retail and co-living housing development containing 104 co-living rooms, ground floor retail premises and a basement level, at 45-57 Parramatta Road, Annandale, is determined by the grant of consent, subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure A.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.