Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Moffatt v Muscat [2023] NSWCATCD 13 Hearing dates: 12 January 2023 Date of orders: 17 January 2023 Decision date: 17 January 2023 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: P French, Senior Member Decision: (1) The landlords, Frank Muscat and Robert Muscat must cause the undertaking of the following work in a proper and workmanlike manner before 28 February 2023:
(a) Permanently disconnect the tank from the water supply from the local water course.
(b) Establish and maintain a filtration system at the top of the tank that ensures that only clean rainwater enters the tank.
(c) Empty all water from the tank.
(d) Thoroughly clean and sanitise the interior of the tank.
(e) Upon completion of the above, fill the tank with clean water suitable for drinking ensuring that it remains full to at least 50% capacity at all times.
(2) The landlords, Frank Muscat and Robert Muscat must pay the tenant, Hailee Moffatt, $100.00 immediately.
(3) The application is otherwise dismissed.
Catchwords: LEASES AND TENANCIES - Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) – obligations of tenant and landlord – landlord’s general obligations – obligation to provide premises in a state fit for habitation – obligation to maintain premises in a reasonable state of repair
Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) – s 41
Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW) – ss 39, 41, 52, 63, 65, 187, 190
Residential Tenancies Amendment (Review) Act 2018 (NSW); Schedule 1
Residential Tenancies Regulation 2019 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Commonwealth v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd [1991] HCA 54; (1992) 174 CLR 64
De Soleil v Palmhide P/L [2010] NSWCTTT 464
Jackson v NSW Land and Housing Corporation [2014] NSWCATAP 22
Texts Cited: Legislative Assembly Hansard 28 September 2018, Residential Tenancies Amendment (Review) Bill 2018, Second Reading Speech
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hailee Moffatt (Applicant)
Frank Muscat (First Respondent)
Robert Muscat (Second Respondent)Representation: Hailee Moffatt (Self-represented)
Victoria Muscat (First and Second Respondents)
Joanne Muscat (First and Second Respondents)
File Number(s): RT 22/45594 Publication restriction: Nil
REASONS FOR DECISION
Introduction
-
This is an application by Hailee Moffat (the tenant) for orders pursuant to sections 52, 63, 187 and 190 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (the Act) that would require Frank and Robert Muscat (the landlords) to pay her $6,000.00 (or some greater sum as determined by the Tribunal) for damage and loss she contends she has incurred because of the failure of the landlords to fulfill their general obligations to pass possession of the premises to her in a state fit for habitation and to maintain the premises in a reasonable state of repair. Specifically, the tenant contends that the landlord failed to ensure that there was a supply of clean water to the premises. The loss she contends for is the cost of purchase of fresh drinking water over the six-and-a-half year period of the tenancy. The tenant also applies for orders…
Continue reading Moffatt v Muscat
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Moffatt v Muscat [2023] NSWCATCD 13
- Case
- [2023] NSWCATCD 13
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the tribunal were whether the landlords had breached their obligations under the Residential Tenancies Act by failing to provide the property in a state fit for habitation and maintain it in a reasonable state of repair. The tribunal needed to determine if the contamination of the water tank constituted a breach of these obligations and, if so, what remedies were appropriate.
The tribunal found that the landlords had indeed breached their obligations. The evidence presented showed that the water tank was contaminated, posing a significant health risk to the tenant. The tribunal emphasised the landlords' duty to provide premises in a state fit for habitation and to maintain the property in a reasonable state of repair. Given the severity of the contamination and the potential health risks, the tribunal ordered specific remedial actions, including the disconnection of the tank from the water supply, the establishment of a filtration system, the cleaning and sanitisation of the tank, and the refilling of the tank with clean, potable water. Additionally, the tribunal ordered the landlords to pay Moffatt $100.00 for the inconvenience and distress caused by the breach.
The tribunal dismissed any other claims made by Moffatt. The final orders required the landlords to undertake the specified remedial actions by a set date and to pay Moffatt the stipulated amount.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) The landlords, Frank Muscat and Robert Muscat must cause the undertaking of the following work in a proper and workmanlike manner before 28 February 2023:
(a) Permanently disconnect the tank from the water supply from the local water course.
(b) Establish and maintain a filtration system at the top of the tank that ensures that only clean rainwater enters the tank.
(c) Empty all water from the tank.
(d) Thoroughly clean and sanitise the interior of the tank.
(e) Upon completion of the above, fill the tank with clean water suitable for drinking ensuring that it remains full to at least 50% capacity at all times.
(2) The landlords, Frank Muscat and Robert Muscat must pay the tenant, Hailee Moffatt, $100.00 immediately.
(3) The application is otherwise dismissed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.