FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Modini v Tax Agents Board of Queensland [2006] FCA 797
DENISE LESLEY MODINI v TAX AGENTS BOARD OF QUEENSLAND
QUD 586 OF 2005
DOWSETT J
3 MARCH 2006
BRISBANE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
QUD 586 OF 2005
BETWEEN:
DENISE LESLEY MODINI
APPLICANTAND:
TAX AGENTS BOARD OF QUEENSLAND
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
DOWSETT J
DATE:
3 MARCH 2006
PLACE:
BRISBANE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Although the matter before me is in the form of an appeal pursuant to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth), it purports to rely upon grounds specified in the Administrative Decisions Judicial Review Act 1977 (Cth) (the “ADJR Act”). I have spent a considerable amount of time today seeking to isolate and identify the matters of complaint which the appellant wishes to raise. In the end I am satisfied, and the appellant agrees, that the issues are as follows:
·that the Tribunal took into account an irrelevant consideration, namely that some part of the appellant’s experience upon which she relied was unsupervised;
·that the Tribunal made an error of law in taking that matter into account; and
·that the findings of fact in pars 47, 54 and 81 of the Tribunal’s reasons are either unsupported by the evidence or so unreasonable that no reasonable person could have so concluded.
I give leave to amend the notice of appeal accordingly on the basis that the matter is to proceed as both a notice of appeal pursuant to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act, and as an application for review pursuant to the Administrative Decisions Judicial Review Act on those grounds. As I understand it, the appellant agrees with that proposed course.
The proceedings under both Acts will be remitted to the Federal Magistrates Court for further consideration. I direct that the record presently available be treated as the record for the purposes of those proceedings. The costs of proceedings to date will be reserved to the Federal Magistrate.
I order that the Administrative Appeals Tribunal be joined as a respondent to these proceedings.
I certify that the preceding four (4) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Dowsett.
Associate:
Dated: 4 July 2006
Counsel for the Applicant:
The applicant appeared in person.
Counsel for the Respondent:
Ms Madeline Brennan
Solicitor for the Respondent:
Australian Government Solicitor
Date of Hearing:
3 March 2006
Date of Judgment:
3 March 2006
- AGLC
- Modini v Tax Agents Board of Queensland [2006] FCA 797
- Case
- [2006] FCA 797
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to decide whether the Administrative Appeals Tribunal had erred in considering the nature of the applicant's experience as irrelevant, whether this constituted an error of law, and if the findings in question were supported by the evidence or reasonable. The court found that the issues raised by the applicant were correctly framed and allowed the amendment to the notice of appeal to proceed under both the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act and the ADJR Act. The court noted that the matter would be remitted to the Federal Magistrates Court for further examination and that the record available would be used for these proceedings. The costs of the proceedings to date were reserved for the Federal Magistrate.
The Federal Court of Australia directed that the proceedings be remitted to the Federal Magistrates Court for further consideration under both the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act and the ADJR Act. The court ordered that the Administrative Appeals Tribunal be joined as a respondent and that the costs of the proceedings to date be reserved to the Federal Magistrate. This decision ensures that the merits of the applicant's appeal are properly reviewed, with all relevant legal grounds being examined by the appropriate court.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: DOWSETT J
Full text does not contain this section.