Modern Awards Review—General Retail Industry Award 2010

Case

[2013] FWCFB 2472

26 APRIL 2013

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2013] FWCFB 2472

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

STATEMENT AND DIRECTIONS

Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009
Item 6, Sch. 5—Modern awards review

Modern Awards Review—General Retail Industry Award 2010
(AM2012/196)

Retail industry

JUSTICE BOULTON, SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HARRISON
COMMISSIONER ROE

SYDNEY, 26 APRIL 2013

[1] At the conclusion of the Mention and Programming proceedings before the Full Bench on 23 April 2013, we advised the parties that we would deal with the application by the Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association (SDA) with respect to adult rates of pay for workers aged 20 years in the General Retail Industry Award 2010 as follows:

  • The timetable previously set for the filing of submissions will be extended. It is noted that the SDA and the Australian Council of Trade Unions have already filed submissions in support of the SDA application.


  • The weeks of 1-5 and 15-19 July 2013 are set aside for the hearing of evidence and submissions, and for any site inspections.


  • The application will be listed for further Mention and Programming proceedings in Sydney at 9:00 am, Thursday 6 June 2013.


  • The parties should confer prior to the proceedings on 6 June 2013 with a view to presenting an agreed proposal as to how the Full Bench should proceed with hearing evidence and submissions and undertaking any necessary site inspections during the weeks set aside.


[2] The following Directions are made:

    1. Submissions and evidence in response to the SDA application are to be filed by 4:00 pm, Tuesday 14 May 2013.

    2. Submissions and evidence in reply are to be filed by the SDA by 4:00 pm, Tuesday 28 May 2013.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, MA000004  PR535923 >

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

1

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0