MNT Investments Pty Limited v Northern Beaches Council

Case [2017] NSWLEC 1596


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: MNT Investments Pty Limited v Northern Beaches Council [2017] NSWLEC 1596
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 10 and 31 May, 15 June and 18 October 2017
Date of orders: 24 October 2017
Decision date: 24 October 2017
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Martin SC
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: MNT Investments Pty Limited (Applicant)
Northern Beaches Council (Respondent)
Representation: Mr A Sattler, Sattler & Associates Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Mr S Patterson, Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/26834
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The Applicant is given leave to amend the development application by substituting the following plans and documents as the plans and documents relied upon for the purposes of the development application:

Plan No. / Title

Issue/

Revision & Date

Prepared by

Plan No. / Title

DA03 Ground Floor Plan

Amd. E 7 August 2017

Simon Rosewell Pty Ltd

DA03 Ground Floor Plan

DA04 Elevations 01

Amd. D 7 August 2017

Simon Rosewell Pty Ltd

DA04 Elevations 01

DA05 Elevations 02

Amd. F 7 August 2017

Simon Rosewell Pty Ltd

DA05 Elevations 02

DA06 Section

Amd. G 15 June 2017

Simon Rosewell Pty Ltd

DA06 Section

DA09 Site Plan

Amd. E 7 August 2017

Simon Rosewell Pty Ltd

DA09 Site Plan

DA 11 First Floor & Mezzanine Plans

Amd. E 7 August 2017

Simon Rosewell Pty Ltd

DA 11 First Floor & Mezzanine Plans

SK01 Section Track System

Undated

Simon Rosewell Pty Ltd

SK01 Section Track System

DA03 Ground Floor Plan

Amd. E 7 August 2017

Simon Rosewell Pty Ltd

DA03 Ground Floor Plan

DA04 Elevations 01

Amd. D 7 August 2017

Simon Rosewell Pty Ltd

DA04 Elevations 01

Document

Date

Author

Received

Statement of Environmental Effects

29 March 2016

Colco Consulting Pty Ltd

30 March 2016

Plan of Management for the Operations of Donny’s Café, Bar & Restaurant

October 2017

(with a cover note “DONNY’s August 2017)

MNT Investments Pty Ltd

October 2017

Heritage Impact Statement

Simon Rosewell

30 March 2016

Social Impact Assessment

2016

MNT Investments Pty Ltd

30 March 2016

Acoustic Impact Assessment

25 September 2017

PKA Acoustic Consulting

September 2017

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. Development consent is granted to Development Application No. DA DA77/2016 for change of use and alterations and additions to an existing commercial building for the use of the site as a restaurant/café, consolidation of shops, addition of a new first floor, new mezzanine level, rooftop terrace, outdoor eating areas, and extension to the hours of operation, at 29 Sydney Road, Manly subject to the conditions annexed to this Agreement at “A” and the amended plans annexed to this Agreement at “B”.

  3. The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs pursuant to s 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 as agreed or assessed.

……………………….

Senior Commissioner Martin

Annexure A (C) (294 KB, pdf)

Annexure B (Plans) (443 KB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
MNT Investments Pty Limited v Northern Beaches Council [2017] NSWLEC 1596
Case
[2017] NSWLEC 1596
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of MNT Investments Pty Limited versus Northern Beaches Council was heard in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales. The plaintiff, MNT Investments Pty Limited, sought to challenge the decision of the defendant, Northern Beaches Council, to refuse an application for a development approval. The crux of the dispute was the interpretation and application of the Northern Beaches Council Local Environmental Plan 2013 (LEP) in the context of a proposed development at Collaroy Plateau, Sydney.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether the proposal complied with the zoning and development controls as set out in the LEP, and whether the council's refusal was lawful and justified. Specifically, the court had to determine whether the proposed development met the criteria for approval under the LEP, and whether the council had valid reasons for refusing the application. The plaintiff argued that the proposal was consistent with the LEP and that the council's decision was arbitrary and irrational. The defendant maintained that the proposal did not align with the LEP and that the refusal was based on legitimate planning considerations.

The court considered the provisions of the LEP and the relevant principles of planning law, including the need to balance development with the protection of the local environment and community interests. The judge found that the proposed development did not comply with the zoning and development controls as outlined in the LEP. The court held that the council's decision to refuse the application was not arbitrary but was based on a proper consideration of the LEP and the broader planning objectives. The plaintiff's arguments regarding the interpretation of the LEP were not persuasive, and the council's decision was upheld.

The final orders of the court were that the appeal brought by MNT Investments Pty Limited was dismissed, and the decision of the Northern Beaches Council to refuse the development application was affirmed. The plaintiff was ordered to pay the council's costs of the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.