| [2017] FWCA 2074 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
MNA Group Pty Ltd T/A GS3
(AG2017/270)
MNA GROUP PTY LTD TRADING AS GS3 SINGLE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Security services | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 26 APRIL 2017 |
Application for approval of the MNA Group Pty Ltd trading as GS3 Single Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the MNA Group Pty Ltd trading as GS3 Single Enterprise Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by MNA Group Pty Ltd T/A GS3. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Agreement was approved on and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 3 May 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 26 April 2021.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE424008 PR591813>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- MNA Group Pty Ltd T/A GS3 [2017] FWCA 2074
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 2074
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the court encompassed whether the proposed agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it met the standards of a single enterprise agreement, particularly in terms of fairness and coverage. The court had to determine if the agreement was genuinely negotiated and if it provided a safety net for employees by offering minimum terms and conditions of employment that were not less favourable than the relevant awards or the general industrial awards.
Upon reviewing the evidence presented, the Fair Work Commission found that the MNA Group Pty Ltd had genuinely negotiated the agreement with its employees. The commission determined that the agreement met the necessary criteria under the Fair Work Act, including the provision of minimum terms and conditions that were not less favourable than applicable awards. The court also considered the fairness of the agreement, taking into account the balance of rights and obligations for both the employer and the employees. Ultimately, the commission approved the Single Enterprise Agreement 2016, finding it to be compliant with the statutory requirements and fair in its provisions.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.