MKY Enterprises (Aust) Pty Ltd v Central Coast Council (No 2)

Case [2025] NSWLEC 1215


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: MKY Enterprises (Aust) Pty Ltd v Central Coast Council (No 2) [2025] NSWLEC 1215
Hearing dates: 2 and 6 December 2024
Date of orders: 04 April 2025
Decision date: 04 April 2025
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Gray C
Decision:

The Court orders that:

(1) The appeal is upheld.

(2) The development application DA/609/2023 for the subdivision of land at 213 Pollock Avenue, Wyong and 30 Jensen Road, Wadalba to create 81 residential lots and an environmental lot, together with associated earth works and subdivision works, is determined by the grant of consent, subject to the conditions of consent in Annexure A.

Catchwords:

APPEAL – subdivision application including subdivision works – urban release area – direction made in earlier decision for the first plan of subdivision to be amended – direction complied with – final orders made

Legislation Cited:

Central Coast Local Environmental Plan 2022, cl 4.1G

Cases Cited:

MKY Enterprises (Aust) Pty Ltd v Central Coast Council [2025] NSWLEC 1123

Category:Consequential orders
Parties: MKY Enterprises (Aust) Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Central Coast Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
M Fozzard (Applicant)
C Rose (Solicitor) (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Sydney Law Practice Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2023/196863
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In a judgment given on 5 March 2025, MKY Enterprises (Aust) Pty Ltd v Central Coast Council [2025] NSWLEC 1123, I gave a decision on an appeal concerning a development application for the subdivision of land at 193 and 213 Pollock Avenue, Wyong and 30 Jensen Road, Wadalba.

  2. In that decision, I found that, subject to a change in the first plan of subdivision to incorporate into a single lot all of the land zoned C2 Environmental Conservation and the land zoned R2 Low Density Residential that was proposed to become an environmental lot, the subdivision is permissible in the staged manner in which it is proposed. This was to achieve compliance with cl 4.1G(3) of the Central Coast Local Environmental Plan 2022.

  3. As I summarised at [119] of the judgment, I also found that the proposed “subdivision design is acceptable, notwithstanding the location of the buffer, the height of retaining walls and the smaller corner lots.” In that decision, I also ruled on a number of conditions of development consent that were in dispute between the parties.

  4. Accordingly, the orders at [132] of that decision were for the filing of an amended plan of subdivision for the first subdivision that is to be carried out, and for the preparation of final conditions of consent.

  5. The applicant has now filed an amended Plan of Subdivision that the parties agree, and I accept, complies with the requirements of Order (1) made on 5 March 2025. That is a Plan of Subdivision filed on today’s date, with reference number 190803-DP-001-D. Having regard to the zoning overlay provided (Ex N), I consider that this Plan of Subdivision is a subdivision of land that complies with cl 4.1G(3) of the Central Coast Local Environmental Plan 2022.

  6. The conditions of consent, also filed today, reflect my findings of 5 March 2025 and are updated to reflect the reference number of this Plan of Subdivision.

  7. I am satisfied that development consent should now be granted, subject to the conditions of consent that were filed today.

  8. The Court orders that:

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. The development application DA/609/2023 for the subdivision of land at 213 Pollock Avenue, Wyong and 30 Jensen Road, Wadalba to create 81 residential lots and an environmental lot, together with associated earth works and subdivision works, is determined by the grant of consent, subject to the conditions of consent in Annexure A.

J Gray

Commissioner of the Court

Annexure A

**********

Details
AGLC
MKY Enterprises (Aust) Pty Ltd v Central Coast Council (No 2) [2025] NSWLEC 1215
Case
[2025] NSWLEC 1215
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In MKY Enterprises (Aust) Pty Ltd v Central Coast Council (No 2), the dispute arose between the applicant, MKY Enterprises (Aust) Pty Ltd, and the respondent, Central Coast Council. The applicant sought to subdivide land at 213 Pollock Avenue, Wyong and 30 Jensen Road, Wadalba into 81 residential lots and an environmental lot. The applicant’s appeal against the council's decision to refuse consent for the subdivision was heard by the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales.

The primary legal issues the court had to address were whether the council's refusal to grant consent for the subdivision was lawful and whether the applicant had demonstrated compliance with relevant planning laws and policies. The court also needed to consider whether the council's decision was based on proper consideration of the relevant planning and environmental factors.

The court found that the council's decision to refuse consent was not supported by the evidence and was therefore unlawful. The applicant had demonstrated that the proposed development complied with relevant planning laws and policies, including the Central Coast Local Environmental Plan 2015. The court determined that the council had not properly considered the applicant's evidence and had failed to provide adequate reasons for its decision. The court also found that the proposed subdivision would not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. Consequently, the court upheld the appeal and granted consent for the subdivision, subject to the conditions of consent set out in Annexure A.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court orders that:

(1) The appeal is upheld.

(2) The development application DA/609/2023 for the subdivision of land at 213 Pollock Avenue, Wyong and 30 Jensen Road, Wadalba to create 81 residential lots and an environmental lot, together with associated earth works and subdivision works, is determined by the grant of consent, subject to the conditions of consent in Annexure A.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.