MJ & JBD and Anor

Case [2006] FamCA 419


[2006] FamCA 419

FAMILY LAW ACT 1975

IN THE FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

AT   No. (P)SYF.2873 of 2005

IN THE MATTER OF: MJ Mother
AND JBD Father
AND LD Second Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

CORAM: Judicial Registrar W. P. Johnston
DATE OF HEARING: 8, 9 and 10 February 2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 31 May 2006

Catchwords

FAMILY LAW - CHILD SUPPORT - Overseas maintenance order

Legislation considered

Family Law Act 1975 – s.66B, s.66B(1), s.66C(1), s.66C(2), s.66G, s.66H, s.66J(1), s.66J(3), s.66K(1), s.66K(4), s.66K(5), s.66P(1), s.66P(1)(d), s.67B

Cases considered

Luckie and Luckie (1989) FLC 92-036

APPEARANCES:

Mr Campton of Counsel instructed by Barkus Edwards Doolan, Solicitors, appeared on behalf of the applicant mother.
Mr Gould of Counsel instructed by McDonell Milne Toltz, Family Lawyers, appeared on behalf of the respondent father and the second respondent.

Applications

  1. The parties are MJ, JBD and LD.  For convenience I shall refer to them as “the mother”, “the father” and “[LD]”.  The mother seeks the following orders:

    1.That pursuant to Section 66G of the Family Law Act 1975 (“the Act”) the father pay to her within 21 days of the date of these Orders by way of child maintenance for the child P born in December 2004 (“the child”) the sum of $27,415.

    2.That in addition to the maintenance provided for in Order 1 and pursuant to Section 66G of the Act, the father pay to the mother within 21 days of the date of these Orders the sum of $4,036 by way of lump sum maintenance for the child.

    3.That pursuant to Section 67B of the Act, the father pay to the mother within 21 days of the date of these Orders the sum of $4,876 by way of maintenance of the mother during the childbirth maintenance period.

    4.That in addition to the maintenance provided for in Orders 1 and 2 and pursuant to Section 66G of the Act, the father pay to the mother within 21 days of the date of these Orders the sum of $464,359 by way of future lump sum child maintenance for the child.

    In the alternative to Order 4 and without concession:

    5.That in addition to the maintenance provided for in Orders 1 and 2 and pursuant to Section 66G of the Act, the father pay to the mother or as she may from time to time direct in writing, child maintenance for the child in the sum of $530 per week, the first payment to be made within seven days of the date of these Orders and the final payment to be made upon the happening of the first of the following events:

    5.1      on the child attaining the age of 18 years;

    5.2      on the death of the child;
              5.3      on the child becoming a member of a couple.

    6.That the child maintenance payable by the father to the mother pursuant to Order 5 is to be varied on 1 July each year, commencing on 1 July 2007, to such sum…

Continue reading MJ & JBD and Anor

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
MJ and JBD and Anor [2006] FamCA 419
Case
[2006] FamCA 419
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned orders made by Judicial Registrar W P Johnston on 31 May 2006, in proceedings between MJ & JBD (the father) and another party (the mother). The dispute involved financial arrangements and child maintenance following the breakdown of the parties' relationship.

The court was required to determine the terms of financial orders, including the deposit of a specific sum of money into a joint account, the payment of periodic child maintenance, and the adjustment of these payments. Additionally, the court considered an application to set aside a property transfer and the distribution of proceeds from a sale. The court also had to address the commencement of these orders and the appointment of registrars to execute documents if a party failed to do so.

The Judicial Registrar ordered the father to deposit $205,920 into a joint account, with withdrawals requiring both parties' signatures. The father was also ordered to pay weekly child maintenance of $220 for their child, commencing from December 2004, with adjustments to be made annually based on the English Consumer Price Index. The mother's application to set aside a property transfer was dismissed, and directions were given for the net proceeds of sale of a property to be paid to a third party, LD. The orders were to commence on 21 June 2006, with leave granted to re-list for submissions on the form of orders and costs prior to that date. The registrars of the Court were appointed to sign documents if a party failed to do so.

Orders

Orders of the court

144.

The orders shall be as follows:

1. That the father forthwith deposit into an account in the names of the father and the mother in a financial institution to be agreed between them the sum of $205,920, withdrawals from such account only to be available upon the signatures of both the father and the mother.

2. That the father shall pay periodic maintenance for the child P born in December 2004 at the weekly rate of $220 commencing in December 2004, such to be payable quarterly on the first day of December, March, June and September each year until the child attains the age of 18 years, or becomes a member of a couple or dies, whichever is the earlier.

3. That for the purposes of these orders both the father and the mother shall forthwith do all things and sign all documents necessary to implement these orders and, in particular, they shall sign the necessary withdrawal forms sufficiently in advance of each quarterly payment to enable the mother to receive the payment not later than 24 hours after the first day of each quarter.

4. That the payment due on 1 June 2006 shall include arrears as from December 2004 adjusted to take account of child maintenance payments made by the father to 1 June 2006, as well as the amount due for the quarter commencing on 1 June 2006.

5. That the weekly rate of $220 child maintenance shall be adjusted on 1 June each year in accordance with movements of the English equivalent of the Australian Consumer Price Index and the quarterly payments shall be adjusted accordingly.

6. That pending further order, the father and mother are restrained from dealing in any way with the account established pursuant to these orders except for the purposes of compliance with these orders.

7. That pursuant to section 67B of the Act, and in addition to the father’s liability pursuant to the above orders, the father shall forthwith pay to the mother, or as she shall in writing direct, the sum of $2,288.

8. That for the purpose only of fulfilling his obligations pursuant to these orders the father is permitted to withdraw from the funds in the Commonwealth Bank Account No. … the necessary monies and he is otherwise restrained pending further order from dealing with such funds.

9. That the mother’s application for an order to set aside the transfer of the property at S by the father to LD be dismissed.

10. That all parties do all acts and sign all documents necessary to instruct J & S Pope, solicitors and the Commonwealth Bank to pay to LD the monies in the controlled monies account with the Commonwealth Bank at a Sydney suburb being the net proceeds of sale of the property at S.

11. That the above orders shall not commence operation until 21 June 2006.

12. That all parties have leave to re-list these proceedings before me by arrangement with my Associate at any time prior to 21 June 2006 for further submissions in relation to the form of the orders only and in relation to any application for costs.

13. That in the event that a party fails to sign any document as required by these orders the registrars of this Court are appointed pursuant to s.106A of the Act to sign such document in the name of the person and to do all acts and things necessary to give validity and operation to the document.

14. That all exhibits be released.

W P Johnston

Judicial Registrar

31 May 2006

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.