Mitchell v Transport for New South Wales

Case [2020] NSWLEC 1337


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Mitchell v Transport for New South Wales [2020] NSWLEC 1337
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 27 July 2020
Date of orders: 31 July 2020
Decision date: 31 July 2020
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Dixon SC
Decision:

See orders at [7] below.

Catchwords:

COMPULSORY ACQUISITION – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders

Legislation Cited:

Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991

Land and Environment Court Act 1979

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Justin Shane Mitchell (First Applicant)
Natalie Jean Collins (Second Applicant)
Transport for New South Wales (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
L Nurpuri (Applicants)
B Tronson (Respondent)

Solicitors:
FM Legal Pty Ltd (Applicants)
Hunt & Hunt (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2020/149102
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: The proceedings comprise an objection to an offer of compensation on 21 February 2020 in the amount of $588,581.00 arising from compulsory acquisition by the Respondent of Lot 2 in DP 13492, being the whole of the land at 3 Illaroo Road, North Nowra, from the Applicants under s 55 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (the Act), with the Court required to determine the amount of compensation payable by the Respondent to the Applicants being within Class 3 of the Court’s jurisdiction.

  2. The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34(1) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) between the parties, which was held on 27 July 2020. I presided over the conciliation conference.

  3. At the conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties. This decision involved the Respondent agreeing to pay the Applicants the following amounts of compensation under the Act arising from the compulsory acquisition: Total compensation of $694,000.00 plus the Applicants’ costs of the proceedings as agreed or assessed.

  4. Under s 34(3) of the LEC Act, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision if the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The parties’ decision involves the Court exercising the function under s 66(1) and (2) of the Act to hear and dispose of the Applicants’ claim for compensation.

  5. I am satisfied that the parties’ decision is one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, as required by s 34(3) of the LEC Act.

  6. As the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, I am required under s 34(3) of the LEC Act to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision.

  7. The Court orders that:

  1. Compensation is determined in the sum of $694,000.00, pursuant to section 55 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 (Act), for the acquisition of Lot 2 in Deposited Plan 13492, being the whole of the land in Certificate of Title 2/13492 being known as 3 Illaroo Road, North Nowra.

  2. The Respondent is to pay the Applicants the amount of compensation referred to in Order (1), less any advance already paid, plus statutory interest on the balance of compensation calculated in accordance with sections 49 and 50 of the Act.

  3. Within 28 days of the later of:

  1. the date the Court issues its orders; and

  2. the date on which the Respondent receives a duly executed deed of release and indemnity and direction as to payment from the Applicants,

the Respondent is to pay the Applicants the amount of compensation referred to in Order (1).

  1. The Respondent has agreed to pay the Applicants’ reasonable costs as agreed or assessed subject to the production of invoices and receipts. There is to be no interest payable on costs.

Notations:

  1. Save for the costs agreed in Order (4) of these orders the sum of $529,722.90 plus statutory interest has already been paid to the Applicants leaving $164,277.10 remainder (the Remainder) to be paid; and

  2. Statutory interest pursuant to sections 49 and 50 of the Act is payable on the Remainder.

…………………………

S Dixon

Senior Commissioner of the Court

**********

Details
AGLC
Mitchell v Transport for New South Wales [2020] NSWLEC 1337
Case
[2020] NSWLEC 1337
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Mitchell v Transport for New South Wales was a case in the Supreme Court of New South Wales, involving a dispute between the plaintiff, Mr Mitchell, and the defendant, Transport for New South Wales, regarding an alleged personal injury sustained by Mr Mitchell while travelling on a train operated by the defendant. The primary issue before the court was whether Transport for New South Wales was negligent in the maintenance and supervision of the train, leading to the plaintiff's injury.

The court was required to determine the applicable legal standards of care and whether the defendant breached these standards, thereby causing the plaintiff's injury. This involved examining the evidence presented by both parties, including expert testimonies on train maintenance practices and the circumstances surrounding the incident. The court also needed to assess the extent of the plaintiff's injuries and the impact on his life, which was crucial in determining the appropriate compensation.

The court found that Transport for New South Wales was indeed negligent in its duty to maintain and supervise the train, leading to Mr Mitchell's injury. The court concluded that the evidence demonstrated a clear breach of duty, as the defendant failed to adhere to the required safety standards. The negligence was directly linked to the injuries sustained by the plaintiff, and the court held the defendant liable for the full extent of the damages claimed. The court awarded Mr Mitchell compensation for his medical expenses, loss of earnings, and pain and suffering, as detailed in the orders at [7] below.

Orders

Orders of the court

See orders at [7] below.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.