Mitchell v The Queen
Case
•
[2001] WASCA 255
•24 AUGUST 2001
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Mitchell v The Queen [2001] WASCA 255
[2001] WASCA 255
24 AUGUST 2001
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the High Court of Australia, Mitchell was convicted of assault occasioning bodily harm. Mitchell appealed against the conviction, seeking an extension of time to do so. The Crown opposed the application on the basis that the application was filed out of time. The legal issues before the court were whether the application was made within a reasonable time and whether exceptional circumstances existed to warrant an extension of the time. The court found that the application was not made within a reasonable time and that no exceptional circumstances existed to warrant an extension. The court dismissed the application for an extension of time to appeal against the conviction. The final orders of the court were that the application for an extension of time to appeal against the conviction was refused.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Sentencing
-
Offences against the person
-
Assault occasioning bodily harm
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Mitchell v The Queen [2001] WASCA 255
Most Recent Citation
Crotty v Peck [2021] WASC 51
Cases Citing This Decision
18
Thompson v The State of Western Australia
[2019] WASCA 68
Spirovski v The State of Western Australia
[2017] WASCA 230
The State of Western Australia v Cheeseman
[2011] WASCA 15
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
1
Ryll v The Queen
[2001] WASCA 185
Peck v The State of Western Australia
[2005] WASCA 20
Peck v The State of Western Australia
[2005] WASCA 20