Mitchell and Mitchell (No.2)
Case
•
[2015] FCCA 2907
•30 October 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Mitchell and Mitchell (No.2) [2015] FCCA 2907
[2015] FCCA 2907
30 October 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Mitchell and Mitchell (No.2)*, the applicant sought orders against the respondent. The precise nature of the dispute between the parties is not detailed in the provided text, but the matter was heard by Judge O'Sullivan.
The central legal issue before the court was the determination of costs. Specifically, the court was required to fix the quantum of costs payable by the applicant to the respondent.
Judge O'Sullivan ordered that the applicant pay the respondent's costs in the fixed amount of $16,481.50. This payment was to be made within 30 days of the order.
The central legal issue before the court was the determination of costs. Specifically, the court was required to fix the quantum of costs payable by the applicant to the respondent.
Judge O'Sullivan ordered that the applicant pay the respondent's costs in the fixed amount of $16,481.50. This payment was to be made within 30 days of the order.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
11
Statutory Material Cited
3
MITCHELL & MITCHELL
[2015] FCCA 2793
Fitzgerald (as child representative for A (Legal Aid Commission of Tasmania)) v Fish and Another
[2005] FamCA 158
Penfold v Penfold
[1980] HCA 4