Mirvac Funds Limited as responsible entity for Mirvac Property Trust v Valuer General of New South Wales

[2025] NSWLEC 1281

Land and Environment Court

New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation:

Mirvac Funds Limited as responsible entity for Mirvac Property Trust v Valuer General of New South Wales [2025] NSWLEC 1281

Hearing dates:

Conciliation Conference on 17 March 2025

Date of orders:

01 May 2025

Decision date:

01 May 2025

Jurisdiction:

Class 3

Before:

Davidson AC

Decision:

The Court orders:

(1) The appeal is upheld.

(2) Pursuant to s 40(1)(b) of the Valuation of Land Act 1916, the Land Value of Lot 40 in Deposited Plan 877867, known as 40 Miller Street, North Sydney NSW 2060 is determined to be $23,050,000 for the 1 July 2023 valuation year.

Catchwords:

VALUATION APPEAL – land valuer – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders

Legislation Cited:

Land and Environment Court Act 1979 ss 19, 34

Valuation of Land Act 1916, Pt 4, ss 6A, 14A, 29, 35, 35B, 35C, 37, 38, 39, 40

North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2013

State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing) 2021

Texts Cited:

North Sydney Development Control Plan 2013

Category:

Principal judgment

Parties:

Mirvac Funds Limited as responsible entity for Mirvac Property Trust (Applicant)
Valuer General of New South Wales (Respondent)

Representation:

Counsel:
M Astill (Applicant)
R White (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Mills Oakley (Applicant)
Crown Solicitor of NSW (Respondent)

File Number(s):

2024/367694

Publication restriction:

No

Judgment

1. COMMISSIONER: The Applicant appeals the Valuer General’s Determination dated 5 August 2024 pursuant to s 37(1) of the Valuation of Land Act 1916 (Valuation Act) in respect of the valuation of the land value of the property legally described as Lot 40 in Deposited Plan 877867, 40 Miller Street, North Sydney NSW 2060 (Land).

1. The proceedings fall within Class 3 of the Court’s jurisdiction pursuant to s 19(b) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act).

2. The statutory power or function to be exercised in determining the proceedings are s 34(3)(a) of the LEC Act and s 40(1)(b) of the Valuation Act.

3. The Applicant appeals the determination of the Valuer General made on 5 August 2024 in respect of the objection made by the Applicant to the valuation of the land value of the land as of 1 July 2023.

Planning Background and Site Features

2. Relevant features of the land are as follows:

3. The Land is a two street corner allotment and is rectangular in shape, other than a splayed corner to Miller and Blue Streets. The natural topography of the land slopes down in a south easterly direction.

4. The Land contains an eastern boundary frontage of 53.63 metres with splay corner to Miller Street, a rear western boundary of 53.65 metres, a northern side boundary of 30.48 metres and a southern side boundary of 27.43 metres to Blue Street. The site area of the Land, as stated in Deposited Plan 877867, is 1,633 square metres.

5. The Land is situated within the commercial zoned area of the North Sydney CBD. Surrounding development comprises a mix of mid and high rise retail/commercial developments of varying age and construction style.

6. At both the date the valuation was made (DVM) of 5 October 2023 and the valuation date of 1 July 2023, the Land was subject to the following planning controls.

1. North Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2013, as amended,

2. North Sydney Development Control Plan 2013,

3. State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing) 2021.

Valuation objections and appeal

7. The valuation objection and history of the appeal includes:

1. On 7 February 2024, the Chief Commissioner of State Revenue issued a Land Tax Assessment Notice to the Applicant conveying particulars of the Respondent’s valuation of the Land made in accordance with s 14A of the Valuation Act. The issued land value for the Land was $29,300,000.

2. On 8 March 2024 the Applicant lodged an objection, to the issued land value for the 2023 valuing year contained in the Land Tax Assessment Notice, with the Respondent pursuant to s 29(3A) of the Valuation Act.

3. On 5 August 2024, pursuant to s 35B of the Valuation Act, the Respondent determined that the land value should not be changed, disallowed the Applicant’s objection, and issued a Notice of Determination to the Applicant as required by s 35C of the Valuation Act.

4. On 4 October 2024, the Applicant filed a Class 3 Application appealing the Respondent’s disallowance of its objection, within the required 60-day period pursuant to s 38 of the Valuation Act.

5. The Land Value contended by the Applicant in the appeal for valuing year 1 July 2023 was $20,870,000 in its Contentions on Valuation Objection.

6. The Land Value contended by the Respondent in the appeal was $29,300,000, which was the same as the issued land value.

Legislation - Valuation of Land Act 1916

8. Section 6A of the Valuation Act provides as follows:

6A   Land value

(1)  The land value of land is the capital sum which the fee-simple of the land might be expected to realise if offered for sale on such reasonable terms and conditions as a bona-fide seller would require, assuming that the improvements, if any, thereon or appertaining thereto, other than land improvements, and made or acquired by the owner or the owner’s predecessor in title had not been made.

(2)  Notwithstanding anything in subsection (1), in determining the land value of any land it shall be assumed that—

(a)  the land may be used, or may continue to be used, for any purpose for which it was being used, or for which it could be used, at the date to which the valuation relates, and

(b)  such improvements may be continued or made on the land as may be required in order to enable the land to continue to be so used, but nothing in this subsection prevents regard being had, in determining that value, to any other purpose for which the land may be used on the assumption that the improvements, if any, other than land improvements, referred to in subsection (1) had not been made.

(3)  Notwithstanding anything in subsection (1), in determining the land value of any land, being land in relation to which, at the date to which the valuation relates, there was a water right—

(a)  the land value shall include the value of the right, and

(b)  it shall be assumed that the right shall continue to apply in relation to the land.

(4)  For the purpose of determining the value of a water right, the value of any water secured by, or referable to, that right is to be ignored.

9. Further, Pt 4, ss 37-40 of the Valuation Act states:

Part 4 Appeals to Land and Environment Court

Division 1 Appeals

37   Right of appeal

(1)  Any person entitled under Part 3 to object to a valuation may appeal to the Land and Environment Court if the person is dissatisfied with the Valuer-General’s determination of any such objection to the valuation concerned (whether or not the person was the objector).

(2) An appeal may not be made on the ground that the objection is taken to have been disallowed, as referred to in section 35C (4), unless written notice of the objector’s intention to appeal on that ground has been given to the Valuer-General at least 14 days before the appeal is made.

(3)  No person or body has jurisdiction or power to conduct a review or hear an appeal in respect of the determination of an objection except as provided by this Part.

38   Time for appeal

(1)  An appeal must be made not later than 60 days after the date of issue of the notice of the Valuer-General’s determination of the objection.

(2)  The Land and Environment Court may allow a person to appeal after the 60-day period.

39   Grounds of appeal

The appellant’s and respondent’s cases on an appeal are not limited to the grounds of the objection.

40   Powers of Land and Environment Court on appeal

(1)  On an appeal, the Land and Environment Court may do any one or more of the following—

(a)  confirm or revoke the decision to which the appeal relates,

(b)  make a decision in place of the decision to which the appeal relates,

(c)  remit the matter to the Valuer-General for determination in accordance with the Court’s finding or decision.

(2)  On an appeal, the appellant has the onus of proving the appellant’s case.

10. The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34(1) of the LEC Act between the parties, which was held on 17 March 2025. I presided over the conciliation conference. The conciliation conference was adjourned until 16 April 2025 to allow the parties’ valuation experts to continue discussions following the provision of additional information.

11. Prior to the adjourned conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties. This decision involved determining the value of the land pursuant to s 6A of the Valuation Act and making a decision in place of the decision to which the appeals relate in relation to the 2023 valuing year pursuant to s 40(1) of the Valuation Act.

12. Under s 34(3) of the LEC Act, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision if the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The parties’ decision involves the Court exercising the function under s 40(1) of the Valuation Act to “make a decision in place of the decision to which the appeal relates” in relation to the land value of the land as of 1 July 2023.

13. There are jurisdictional prerequisites that must be satisfied before this function can be exercised. The parties identified the proceedings fall within Class 3 of the Court’s jurisdiction pursuant to s 19(b) of the LEC Act and explained how the jurisdictional prerequisites have been met:

1. The Applicant was the owner of the freehold estate in the land at the time the land tax notice was given (s 29(1)(a) of the Valuation Act) and was the person who lodged the written objection to the notice under s 29(3) of the Valuation Act.

2. On 7 February 2024, the Chief Commissioner of State Revenue issued a Land Tax Assessment Notice to the Applicant. The Respondent’s valuation notice pursuant to s 29 of the Valuation Act was contained in that assessment in relation to the 2023 valuation year

3. On 8 March 2024, the Applicant lodged an objection to the 2023 land value pursuant to s 29(3A) of the Valuation Act within the prescribed time for lodging an objection pursuant to s 35(1)(b) of the Valuation Act. The valuation used as the basis of the land tax assessment had not been the subject of a prior objection, and as such, s 35AA of the Valuation Act did not apply.

4. On 5 August 2024, the Valuer-General disallowed the Applicant’s objection in relation to the 2023 valuing year pursuant to s 35B and issued a Notice of Determination to the Applicant as required by s 35C of the Valuation Act.

5. On 4 October 2024, the Applicant lodged an appeal pursuant to s 37 of the Valuation Act in respect of the 2023 valuing year in this Court, within the 60-day period imposed by s 38(1) of the Valuation Act.

6. On 17 March 2025, a conciliation conference was held under s 34(1) of the LEC Act, with Acting Commissioner Davidson presiding. The conciliation conference was adjourned until 16 April 2025 to allow the parties valuation experts to continue discussions following the provision of additional information.

7. The parties reached an agreement to resolve the proceedings in relation to the 2023 Determination.

8. The agreement reached between the parties to resolve the proceedings complies with s 40(1)(b) of the Valuation Act, in that the parties ask the Court to make decisions in place of the decisions to which the appeal relates, which are decisions that the Land and Environment Court has the jurisdiction and power to make.

14. For the reasons set out above, I am satisfied that the parties’ decision is one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, as required by s 34(3)(a) and (b) of the LEC Act for the “disposal of proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision”.

15. As the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, I am required under s 34(3) of the LEC Act to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision.

Notation:

16. The Court notes:

1. Each party is to bear its own costs in relation to the proceedings.

Orders:

17. The Court orders:

1. The appeal is upheld.

2. Pursuant to s 40(1)(b) of the Valuation of Land Act 1916, the Land Value of Lot 40 in Deposited Plan 877867, known as 40 Miller Street, North Sydney NSW 2060 is determined to be $23,050,000 for the 1 July 2023 valuation year.

Michael Davidson

Acting Commissioner of the Court

**********

Decision last updated: 01 May 2025