Legal Research
Cases
Milutinovic v Transport Accident Commission

Milutinovic v Transport Accident Commission

Case [2022] VCC 2022

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Milutinovic v Transport Accident Commission [2022] VCC 2022
Case: [2022] VCC 2022
Decision Date: 25 November 2022

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Milutinovic v Transport Accident Commission [2022] VCC 2022

Most Recent Citation

Director of Public Prosecutions v Joveski [2021] VCC 2022

Cases Citing This Decision

Director of Public Prosecutions v Joveski [2021] VCC 2022
Citation 1

…[2022] VCC 2022…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Johns v Oaktech Pty Ltd [2020] VSCA 10
Citation 1

…h psychological condition following assault at work Legislation Cited: Transport Accident Act 1986 Cases Cited: Johns v Oaktech Pty Ltd [2020] VSCA 10; Rowe v Transport Accident Commission [2017] VSCA 377; Humphries v Poljak (1992) 2 VR 129, 140; Mobilio v Balliotis [1998] 3 VR 833; Richards & Anor v Wylie (2001)…
Rowe v Transport Accident Commission [2017] VSCA 377
Citation 2

…egislation Cited: Transport Accident Act 1986 Cases Cited: Johns v Oaktech Pty Ltd [2020] VSCA 10; Rowe v Transport Accident Commission [2017] VSCA 377; Humphries v Poljak (1992) 2 VR 129, 140; Mobilio v Balliotis [1998] 3 VR 833; Richards & Anor v Wylie (2001) 1 VR 79; Transport Accident Commission v Garcia [2015…
Transport Accident Commission v Garcia [2015] VSCA 225
Citation 3

…992) 2 VR 129, 140; Mobilio v Balliotis [1998] 3 VR 833; Richards & Anor v Wylie (2001) 1 VR 79; Transport Accident Commission v Garcia [2015] VSCA 225 Judgment: Leave refused to commence a proceeding for pain and suffering and pecuniary loss damages…
Peak Engineering & Anor v McKenzie [2014] VSCA 67
Citation 4

…oing symptoms in his right shoulder or cervical spine, whether considered in isolation or in combination.[27] [26] Peak Engineering & Anor v McKenzie [2014] VSCA 67 at paragraphs [23[-[25] [27]Some evidence suggests that the loss of function of the right shoulder may be related to the cervical spine 41Mr Milutino…
Nichols v Robinson [2001] VSCA 11
Citation 5

…ident Commission [2017] VSCA 377; Humphries v Poljak (1992) 2 VR 129, 140; Mobilio v Balliotis [1998] 3 VR 833; Richards & Anor v Wylie (2001) 1 VR 79; Transport Accident Commission v Garcia [2015] VSCA 225 Judgment: Leave refused to commence a proceeding for pain and suffering and pecuniary loss damages…
Richards v Wylie [2000] VSCA 50
Citation 6

…10; Rowe v Transport Accident Commission [2017] VSCA 377; Humphries v Poljak (1992) 2 VR 129, 140; Mobilio v Balliotis [1998] 3 VR 833; Richards & Anor v Wylie (2001) 1 VR 79; Transport Accident Commission v Garcia [2015] VSCA 225 Judgment: Leave refused to commence a proceeding for pain and suffering and pecuniary loss damages…
Barlow v Hollis [2000] VSCA 26
Citation 7

…airly described at least as ‘very considerable’ and certainly more than ‘significant’ or ‘marked’ ”.[5] [5] Humphries v Poljak [1992] 2 VR 129 at 140 17The severity of a mental or behavioural disturbance or disorder is determined by whether the consequences to the plaintiff, when judged by comparison with o…

AI Chat coming soon