| [2016] FWCA 5938 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Millpark Construction
(AG2016/3909)
MILLPARK CONSTRUCTION PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016 - 2020
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 23 AUGUST 2016 |
Application for approval of the Millpark Construction Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2016 - 2020.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Millpark Construction Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2016 - 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Millpark Construction. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 30 August 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 23 August 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE420688 PR584531>
- AGLC
- Millpark Construction [2016] FWCA 5938
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 5938
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues at hand included whether the agreement provided appropriate mechanisms for the resolution of workplace disputes and whether it adequately protected employees' rights to fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it included provisions for the protection of vulnerable workers.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement did not adequately safeguard employees' rights and did not provide sufficient mechanisms for the resolution of workplace disputes. The Commission concluded that the agreement failed to meet the requirements of the Fair Work Act, particularly in relation to the protection of vulnerable workers. Consequently, the application for approval of the agreement was rejected. The Commission emphasised the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements provide adequate protections for all employees, particularly those in vulnerable positions.
The Fair Work Commission ordered that the enterprise agreement be disallowed and that the application for its approval be dismissed. The decision underscored the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements meet the necessary legal criteria for approval and that they provide adequate protections for all employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.