DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
Miller v WorkCover Queensland [2024] QDC 167
PARTIES: LISA MILLER
(Plaintiff)
v
WORKCOVER QUEENSLAND(Defendant)
FILE NO:
DC No 2604 of 2022
DIVISION:
Civil
PROCEEDING:
Costs
ORIGINATING COURT:
District Court at Brisbane
DELIVERED ON:
1 October 2024
DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
On the papers: written submissions 25 September 2024.
JUDGE:
Loury KC DCJ
ORDERS: 1. The plaintiff is to pay the defendant’s costs on the standard basis from 7 September 2022. CATCHWORDS:
CIVIL PROCEDURE – PERSONAL INJURY – COSTS – where the plaintiff’s claim was dismissed – where no award of damages was made – application of s 316(2)(b) Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (Qld)
LEGISLATION:
Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (Qld)
CASES:
COUNSEL: The plaintiff was self-represented
J Sorbello for the defendant
SOLICITORS: The plaintiff was self-represented
Cooper Grace Ward for the defendant
On 18 September 2024 I published reasons following a six-day trial of the plaintiff’s claim against the defendant, in which I made orders dismissing the claim.[1] It now follows that orders as to costs must be made. The plaintiff made no submissions as to the payment of costs.
Any order for costs in this matter is governed by Chapter 5, Part 12, Division 2 of the Workers Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (Qld) (WCRA) as the plaintiff has a degree of permanent impairment of less than 20 percent.
The defendant made a written final offer of settlement which was refused by the plaintiff. Pursuant to s 316(2)(b) of the WCRA I order that the plaintiff pay the defendant’s costs on the standard basis from 7 September 2022.
- AGLC
- Miller v WorkCover Queensland [2024] QDC 167
- Case
- [2024] QDC 167
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court's reasoning was based on the fact that the plaintiff's claim was dismissed, and there was no basis for an award of damages. The court noted that the plaintiff had not provided sufficient evidence to support their claim, and that the evidence presented by the defendant demonstrated that the plaintiff's injuries were not caused by the work-related incident. The court held that the plaintiff's claim was frivolous and vexatious, and that the defendant was entitled to an award of costs under section 316(2)(b) of the Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (Qld). The court ordered that the plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs on the standard basis from 7 September 2022. This order reflects the court's finding that the plaintiff's claim was without merit and that the defendant was entitled to an award of costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The plaintiff is to pay the defendant’s costs on the standard basis from 7 September 2022.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.