Miller v Nationwide News Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2008] NSWCA 261
•13 October 2008
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Miller v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 261
[2008] NSWCA 261
13 October 2008
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Miller (the applicant) sought a stay of proceedings pending an application for special leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia against a decision of Nationwide News Pty Ltd (the respondent). The application for a stay was heard by McColl JA of the Court of Appeal of New South Wales.
The primary legal issue before McColl JA was whether the applicant had demonstrated a sufficient prospect of success in obtaining special leave to appeal to the High Court. This required an assessment of whether the applicant's proposed grounds of appeal raised a question of law that the High Court would consider significant enough to grant special leave.
McColl JA applied the well-established principles governing applications for a stay pending an application for special leave. These principles require the applicant to show that there are substantial prospects of the High Court granting special leave. In this instance, McColl JA found that the applicant had failed to demonstrate that the appeal raised any question of law that warranted the High Court’s attention. Consequently, the application for a stay was refused.
McColl JA ordered that the applicant pay the costs of the application.
The primary legal issue before McColl JA was whether the applicant had demonstrated a sufficient prospect of success in obtaining special leave to appeal to the High Court. This required an assessment of whether the applicant's proposed grounds of appeal raised a question of law that the High Court would consider significant enough to grant special leave.
McColl JA applied the well-established principles governing applications for a stay pending an application for special leave. These principles require the applicant to show that there are substantial prospects of the High Court granting special leave. In this instance, McColl JA found that the applicant had failed to demonstrate that the appeal raised any question of law that warranted the High Court’s attention. Consequently, the application for a stay was refused.
McColl JA ordered that the applicant pay the costs of the application.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Jurisdiction
-
Stay of Proceedings
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Miller v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 411
Cases Citing This Decision
10
Rinehart v Welker
[2011] NSWCA 425
Saleh v Romanous
[2010] NSWCA 373
Bennette v Cohen (No 2)
[2009] NSWCA 162
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
2
Minister for Local Government v South Sydney City Council (No 3)
[2002] NSWCA 327