Milena Molina v Brett Galloway
Case
•
[2022] FWC 776
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Milena Molina v Brett Galloway [2022] FWC 776
[2022] FWC 776
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicants, Milena Molina and Raymond Zhai, applied to the Fair Work Commission for an unfair dismissal remedy against their former employer, Brett Galloway. The applicants were summarily dismissed by Galloway in March 2020 and subsequently found in favour by Deputy President Dean, a decision which was overturned by a Full Bench and remitted back to Deputy President Easton. The central issue was whether the applicants were unfairly dismissed. Deputy President Easton found that there was no valid reason to dismiss the applicants and that the dismissals were harsh, unjust and unreasonable. The applicants were awarded compensation. The dismissals were found to be unfair because the applicants were dismissed for conduct that had already been dealt with by Galloway, there was no reasonable investigation into the alleged misconduct, and the dismissals were effected without procedural fairness. The amount of compensation was calculated using the Sprigg formula, taking into account factors such as the length of service, remuneration lost, and efforts to mitigate the loss.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
-
Commercial Law
Legal Concepts
-
Unfair Dismissal
-
Compensatory Damages
-
Breach of Contract
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Contract Formation
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Molina v Galloway (No 2) [2023] FedCFamC2G 310
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Molina v Galloway (No 2)
[2023] FedCFamC2G 310
Molina v Galloway
[2022] FedCFamC2G 904
Molina v Galloway (No 2)
[2023] FedCFamC2G 310
Cases Cited
26
Statutory Material Cited
0
Mr. Wayne Darvell v Australia Post
[2009] FWA 1406
Sydney Trains v Gary Hilder
[2020] FWCFB 1373