Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar
[2011] HCA 21
Citation 1
…es to the facts assumed or observed so as to produce the opinion propounded’ . [6] (2001) 52 NSWLR 705, 743 [85], approved in Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588, 604 [37]. 9.In a separate judgment in Dasreef ,[7] Heydon J considered the contentions put that the text of s 79 of the Evidence Act rendered the rules develope…
ASIC v Rich
[2005] NSWSC 149
Citation 2
…nce Act 2008 (Vic). [9] See also the summary list of considerations identified by Austin J in ASIC v Rich [2005] NSWSC 149…
Clark v Ryan
[1960] HCA 42
Citation 3
…ssues in the proceeding can be determined without the need for expert evidence Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 2008 Cases Cited: Clark v Ryan (1960) 103 CLR 486; Parrish v Specialized Australia Pty Ltd (Rulings) [2020] VSC 15 followed. Judgment: Evidence inadmissible…
WILLANS & ENMORE
[2021] FamCA 73
Citation 4
…t requires identification of the fact in issue that the party tendering the evidence asserts the opinion proves or assists in proving . [2] (2011) 243 CLR 588. [3] Ibid 604 [37]. [4] Ibid 602 [31]. [5] Of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), cf. s 76 of the Evidence Act 2008 (Vic).…
Bartel and Schneider (No. 2)
[2012] FamCA 890
Citation 5
…n is “wholly or substantially based”, applies to the facts assumed or observed so as to produce the opinion propounded’ . [6] (2001) 52 NSWLR 705, 743 [85], approved in Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar (2011) 243 CLR 588, 604 [37]. 9.In a separate judgment in Dasreef ,[7] Heydon J considered the contentions put that the text…
Parrish v Specialized Australia Pty Ltd (Rulings)
[2020] VSC 15
Citation 6
…evidence Legislation Cited: Evidence Act 2008 Cases Cited: Clark v Ryan (1960) 103 CLR 486; Parrish v Specialized Australia Pty Ltd (Rulings) [2020] VSC 15 followed. Judgment: Evidence inadmissible…
Rees v Lumen Christi Primary School
[2010] VSC 514
Citation 7
…ons and which does not apply any scientific reasoning to those facts is not admissible.[11] [11] See: Rees v Lumen Christi Primary School [2010] VSC 514. 21.Next the defendant asserted that the assumed facts in any event provide no or no sufficient basis to admit of the requirement for the expression of specialis…