Migration Legislation Amendment (2016 Measures No. 5) Regulation 2016 (Cth)
I, General the Honourable Sir Peter Cosgrove AK MC (Ret’d), Governor‑General of the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, make the following regulation.
Dated 10 November 2016
Peter Cosgrove
Governor‑General
By His Excellency’s Command
Peter Dutton
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
Contents
This is the
Migration Legislation Amendment (2016 Measures No. 5) Regulation 2016 .
(1) Each provision of this instrument specified in column 1 of the table commences, or is taken to have commenced, in accordance with column 2 of the table. Any other statement in column 2 has effect according to its terms.
The whole of this instrument | 19 November 2016. | 19 November 2016 |
Note: This table relates only to the provisions of this instrument as originally made. It will not be amended to deal with any later amendments of this instrument.
(2) Any information in column 3 of the table is not part of this instrument. Information may be inserted in this column, or information in it may be edited, in any published version of this instrument.
This instrument is made under the
Migration Act 1958.
Each instrument that is specified in a Schedule to this instrument is amended or repealed as set out in the applicable items in the Schedule concerned, and any other item in a Schedule to this instrument has effect according to its terms.
Repeal the note, substitute:
Note: An item of Schedule 1 may provide for matters to be specified by the Minister in a legislative instrument made under subregulation (5).
Omit “in Schedule 1 prescribes any of the following requirements”, substitute “of Schedule 1 prescribes criteria or requirements”.
Omit “the requirement”, substitute “any of the following matters for the purposes of such a criterion or requirement”.
Insert:
; (d) any other matter.
Omit “requirements”, substitute “matters”.
Before “first instalment”, insert “in relation to an application for a Subclass 600 (Visitor) visa that is not in the Frequent Traveller stream—”.
Insert:
(aa) in relation to an application for a Subclass 600 (Visitor) visa in the Frequent Traveller stream—first instalment (payable at the time the application is made): the base application charge is $1,000; and
Insert:
Frequent Traveller stream—additional requirements
(6A) For an applicant seeking to satisfy the primary criteria for a Subclass 600 (Visitor) visa in the Frequent Traveller stream, the requirements in the table must be met.
1 | An application must be made at the place, and in the manner, (if any) specified by the Minister in a legislative instrument made for the purposes of this item under subregulation 2.07(5) |
2 | The applicant must be: (a) outside Australia; and
|
3 | The applicant must hold a valid passport of a kind specified by the Minister in a legislative instrument made for the purposes of this item under subregulation 2.07(5). |
Subclasses
After:
If an applicant applies for a Subclass 600 visa in the Approved Destination Status stream, the criteria in Subdivisions 600.21 and 600.25 are the primary criteria.
insert:
If an applicant applies for a Subclass 600 visa in the Frequent Traveller stream, the criteria in Subdivisions 600.21 and 600.26are the primary criteria.
Add:
Note: These criteria are only for applicants seeking to satisfy the primary criteria for a Subclass 600 visa in the Frequent Traveller stream.
The applicant intends to visit Australia:
(a) as a tourist; or
(b) to engage in a business visitor activity.
The applicant does not intend to engage in activities that will have adverse consequences for employment or training opportunities, or conditions of employment, for Australian citizens or Australian permanent residents.
Before “If the visa”, insert “(1)”.
Add:
(2) Despite subclause (1), if the applicant satisfied the primary criteria for the grant of a Subclass 600 visa in the Frequent Traveller stream, temporary visa permitting the holder:
(a) to travel to and enter Australia on multiple occasions until a date specified by the Minister (which must not be more than 10 years after the date of grant of the visa); and
(b) to remain in Australia, after each entry, for 3 months.
Add:
If the visa is a Subclass 600 visa in the Frequent Traveller stream, conditions 8115, 8201, 8503, 8516, 8527, 8531, 8550, 8572 and 8573 must be imposed.
Add:
8572 If requested in writing by the Minister to do so, the holder must undergo a medical assessment carried out by any of the following:
(a) a Medical Officer of the Commonwealth;
(b) a medical practitioner approved by the Minister;
(c) a medical practitioner employed by an organisation approved by the Minister.
8573 The holder must not stay in Australia for more than 12 months in any period of 24 months.
Before “In the case”, insert “(1)”.
Omit “28 days after the holder is notified of that refusal”, substitute “35 days after the Minister makes the decision”.
Repeal the subparagraph, substitute:
(iia) if the substantive visa application is refused and the Tribunal decides that the holder’s application for merits review of that refusal was not made in accordance with the law governing the making of applications to the Tribunal—35 days after the Tribunal makes the decision; or
(iii) if the substantive visa application is refused and the Tribunal makes a decision on the holder’s application for merits review of that refusal (other than a decision to remit the application to the Minister for reconsideration)—35 days after the Tribunal makes the decision; or
Omit “28 days”, substitute “35 days”.
5
Subparagraphs 010.511(b)(vii) and (viii) of Schedule 2 Repeal the subparagraphs, substitute:
(vii) if the Minister decides that the substantive visa application is invalid—35 days after the Minister makes the decision; or
(viii) if the Tribunal remits the substantive visa application to the Minister for reconsideration—the day worked out in accordance with whichever subparagraph of this paragraph applies in relation to the reconsideration.
Add:
(2) For the purposes of subparagraphs (1)(b)(ii), (iia), (iii) and (vii), the 35 day period begins to run:
(a) despite any failure to comply with the requirements of the Act or these Regulations in relation to the decision mentioned in the subparagraph; and
(b) irrespective of the validity of the decision.
Omit “paragraph 010.511(b)”, substitute “paragraph 010.511(1)(b)”.
Before “In the case”, insert “(1)”.
Omit “28 days after the holder is notified of that refusal”, substitute “35 days after the Minister makes the decision”.
Repeal the subparagraph, substitute:
(iia) if the substantive visa application is refused and the Tribunal decides that the holder’s application for merits review of that refusal was not made in accordance with the law governing the making of applications to the Tribunal—35 days after the Tribunal makes the decision; or
(iii) if the substantive visa application is refused and the Tribunal makes a decision on the holder’s application for merits review of that refusal (other than a decision to remit the application to the Minister for reconsideration)—35 days after the Tribunal makes the decision; or
Omit “28 days”, substitute “35 days”.
12
Subparagraphs 020.511(b)(vii) and (viii) of Schedule 2 Repeal the subparagraphs, substitute:
(vii) if the Minister decides that the substantive visa application is invalid—35 days after the Ministermakes the decision; or
(viii) if the Tribunal remits the substantive visa application to the Minister for reconsideration—the day worked out in accordance with whichever subparagraph of this paragraph applies in relation to the reconsideration; and
Add:
(2) For the purposes of subparagraphs (1)(b)(ii), (iia), (iii) and (vii), the 35 day period begins to run:
(a) despite any failure to comply with the requirements of the Act or these Regulations in relation to the decision mentioned in the subparagraph; and
(b) irrespective of the validity of the decision.
Omit “paragraph 020.511(b)”, substitute “paragraph 020.511(1)(b)”.
Before “In the case”, insert “(1)”.
Omit “28 days after the holder is notified of that refusal”, substitute “35 days after the Minister makes the decision”.
Repeal the subparagraph, substitute:
(iia) if the substantive visa application is refused and the Tribunal decides that the holder’s application for merits review of that refusal was not made in accordance with the law governing the making of applications to the Tribunal—35 days after the Tribunal makes the decision; or
(iii) if the substantive visa application is refused and the Tribunal makes a decision on the holder’s application for merits review of that refusal (other than a decision to remit the application to the Minister for reconsideration)—35 days after the Tribunal makes the decision; or
Omit “28 days”, substitute “35 days”.
19
Subparagraphs 030.511(b)(vi) and (vii) of Schedule 2 Repeal the subparagraphs, substitute:
(vi) if the Minister decides that the substantive visa application is invalid—35 days after the Ministermakes the decision; or
(vii) if the Tribunal remits the substantive visa application to the Minister for reconsideration—the day worked out in accordance with whichever subparagraph of this paragraph applies in relation to the reconsideration; or
(2) For the purposes of subparagraphs (1)(b)(ii), (iia), (iii) and (vi), the 35 day period begins to run:
(a) despite any failure to comply with the requirements of the Act or these Regulations in relation to the decision mentioned in the subparagraph; and
(b) irrespective of the validity of the decision.
Omit “paragraph 030.511(b)”, substitute “paragraph 030.511(1)(b)”.
Before “In the case”, insert “(1)”.
Omit “28 days after the holder is notified of that refusal”, substitute “35 days after the Minister makes the decision”.
24
Subparagraphs 050.511(b)(iii) and (iiia) of Schedule 2 Repeal the subparagraphs, substitute:
(iia) if the substantive visa application is refused and the Tribunal decides that the holder’s application for merits review of that refusal was not made in accordance with the law governing the making of applications to the Tribunal—35 days after the Tribunal makes the decision; or
(iii) if the substantive visa application is refused and the Tribunal makes a decision on the holder’s application for merits review of that refusal (other than a decision to remit the application to the Minister for reconsideration)—35 days after the Tribunal makes the decision; or
(iiia) if the substantive visa application is refused and the Immigration Assessment Authority makes a decision under subsection 473CC(2) of the Act on referral of that refusal under section 473CA of the Act (other than a decision to remit the application to the Minister for reconsideration)—35 days after the Immigration Assessment Authority makes the decision; or
Omit “28 days”, substitute “35 days”.
26
Subparagraphs 050.511(b)(vi) and (vii) of Schedule 2 Repeal the subparagraphs, substitute:
(vi) if the Minister decides that the substantive visa application is invalid—35 days after the Ministermakes the decision; or
(vii) if the Tribunal or the Immigration Assessment Authority remits the substantive visa application to the Minister for reconsideration—the day worked out in accordance with whichever subparagraph of this paragraph applies in relation to the reconsideration.
Add:
(2) For the purposes of subparagraphs (1)(b)(ii), (iia), (iii), (iiia) and (vi), the 35 day period begins to run:
(a) despite any failure to comply with the requirements of the Act or these Regulations in relation to the decision mentioned in the subparagraph; and
(b) irrespective of the validity of the decision.
Before “In the case”, insert “(1)”.
Omit “28 days after”.
Before “the day”, insert “28 days after”.
Omit “the day the non‑citizen is notified of the decision of the Minister or the Tribunal”, substitute “35 days after the day the Minister or Tribunal makes a decision on the reconsideration”.
32
Subparagraphs 050.511C(b)(iii) and (iv) of Schedule 2 Before “the day”, insert “28 days after”.
Add:
(2) For the purposes of subparagraph (1)(b)(ii), the 35 day period begins to run:
(a) despite any failure to comply with the requirements of the Act or these Regulations in relation to the decision mentioned in the subparagraph; and
(b) irrespective of the validity of the decision.
Before “In the case”, insert “(1)”.
Omit “28 days”, substitute “35 days”.
36
Subparagraphs 050.511D(b)(i) and (ii) of Schedule 2 Repeal the subparagraphs, substitute:
(i) if the Tribunal decides that the holder’s application for merits review was not made in accordance with the law governing the making of applications to the Tribunal—the day the Tribunal makes the decision;
(ia) if the Tribunal makes a decision on the holder’s application for merits review (other than a decision to remit the application to the Minister for reconsideration)—the day the Tribunal makes the decision;
(ii) if the Tribunal remits the application to the Minister for reconsideration—the day the Minister makes a decision on the reconsideration;
Add:
(2) The 35 day period worked out by reference to subparagraphs (1)(b)(i), (ia) and (ii) begins to run:
(a) despite any failure to comply with the requirements of the Act or these Regulations in relation to the decision mentioned in the subparagraph; and
(b) irrespective of the validity of the decision.
Omit “paragraph 050.511(b), clause 050.513 or clause 050.513B”, substitute “paragraph 050.511(1)(b) or subclause 050.513(1) or 050.513B(1)”.
Before “In the case”, insert “(1)”.
Repeal the paragraph, substitute:
(a) if the Tribunal decides that the holder’s application for merits review was not made in accordance with the law governing the making of applications to the Tribunal—35 days after the Tribunal makes the decision; or
(aa) if the Tribunal makes a decision on the holder’s application for merits review—35 days after the Tribunal makes the decision; or
Omit “28 days”, substitute “35 days”.
Add:
(2) For the purposes of paragraphs (1)(a) and (aa), the 35 day period begins to run:
(a) despite any failure to comply with the requirements of the Act or these Regulations in relation to the decision mentioned in the paragraph; and
(b) irrespective of the validity of the decision.
Repeal the subparagraph, substitute:
(i) 14 working days after the day the decision is made on the revocation application; or
Omit “7”, substitute “14”.
Omit “clause 050.513B”, substitute “subclause 050.513B(1)”.
Before “In the case”, insert “(1)”.
Repeal the paragraph, substitute:
(a) if the Tribunal decides that the holder’s application for merits review was not made in accordance with the law governing the making of applications to the Tribunal—35 days after the Tribunal makes the decision; or
(aa) if the Tribunal makes a decision on the holder’s application for merits review—35 days after the Tribunal makes the decision; or
Omit “28 days”, substitute “35 days”.
Add:
(2) For the purposes of paragraphs (1)(a) and (aa), the 35 day period begins to run:
(a) despite any failure to comply with the requirements of the Act or these Regulations in relation to the decision mentioned in the paragraph; and
(b) irrespective of the validity of the decision.
Before “In the case”, insert “(1)”.
Repeal the paragraph, substitute:
(a) if the Tribunal decides that the application for merits review made by the other person whose visa was cancelled was not made in accordance with the law governing the making of applications to the Tribunal—35 days after the Tribunal makes the decision; or
(aa) if the Tribunal makes a decision on the application for merits review made by the other person whose visa was cancelled—35 days after the Tribunal makes the decision; or
Omit “28 days”, substitute “35 days”.
Add:
(2) For the purposes of paragraphs (1)(a) and (aa), the 35 day period begins to run:
(a) despite any failure to comply with the requirements of the Act or these Regulations in relation to the decision mentioned in the paragraph; and
(b) irrespective of the validity of the decision.
Repeal the subparagraph, substitute:
(i) 14 working days after the day the decision is made on the revocation application; or
Omit “7”, substitute “14”.
Omit “clause 050.514AB”, substitute “subclause 050.514AB(1)”.
Before “In the case”, insert “(1)”.
Repeal the paragraph, substitute:
(a) if the Tribunal decides that the application for merits review made by the person whose visa was cancelled under section 137J of the Act was not made in accordance with the law governing the making of applications to the Tribunal—35 days after the Tribunal makes the decision; or
(aa) if the Tribunal makes a decision on the application for merits review made by the person whose visa was cancelled under section 137J of the Act—35 days after the Tribunal makes the decision; or
Omit “28 days”, substitute “35 days”.
Add:
(2) For the purposes of paragraphs (1)(a) and (aa), the 35 day period begins to run:
(a) despite any failure to comply with the requirements of the Act or these Regulations in relation to the decision mentioned in the paragraph; and
(b) irrespective of the validity of the decision.
Before “In the case”, insert “(1)”.
Omit “28 days after the holder is notified of that refusal”, substitute “35 days after the Minister makes the decision”.
Repeal the paragraphs, substitute:
(b) if the protection visa application is refused and the Tribunal decides that the holder’s application for merits review of that refusal was not made in accordance with the law governing the making of applications to the Tribunal—35 days after the Tribunal makes the decision; or
(ba) if the protection visa application is refused and the Tribunal makes a decision on the holder’s application for merits review of that refusal (other than a decision to remit the application to the Minister for reconsideration)—35 days after the Tribunal makes the decision; or
(bb) if the protection visa application is refused and the Immigration Assessment Authority makes a decision under subsection 473CC(2) of the Act on referral of that refusal under section 473CA of the Act (other than a decision to remit the application to the Minister for reconsideration)—35 days after the Immigration Assessment Authority makes the decision; or
Omit “28 days”, substitute “35 days”.
Repeal the paragraph, substitute:
(e) if the Minister decides that the protection visa application is invalid—35 days after the Minister makes the decision; or
Omit “permitting the holder of the bridging visa to remain in Australia in accordance with the relevant provision of this clause”, substitute “the end of the period worked out in accordance with whichever paragraph of this subclause applies in relation to the reconsideration”.
Add:
(2) For the purposes of subparagraph (1)(a)(ii) and paragraphs (1)(b), (ba), (bb) and (e), the 35 day period begins to run:
(a) despite any failure to comply with the requirements of the Act or these Regulations in relation to the decision mentioned in the paragraph or subparagraph; and
(b) irrespective of the validity of the decision.
Omit “clause 051.511”, substitute “subclause 051.511(1)”.
Omit “28 days after the holder is notified of that refusal”, substitute “35 days after the Minister makes the decision”.
70
Paragraphs 051.513(1)(b) and (ba) of Schedule 2 Repeal the paragraphs, substitute:
(b) if the protection visa application is refused and the Tribunal decides that the holder’s application for merits review of that refusal was not made in accordance with the law governing the making of applications to the Tribunal—35 days after the Tribunal makes the decision; or
(ba) if the protection visa application is refused and the Tribunal makes a decision on the holder’s application for merits review of that refusal (other than a decision to remit the application to the Minister for reconsideration)—35 days after the Tribunal makes the decision; or
(bb) if the protection visa application is refused and the Immigration Assessment Authority makes a decision under subsection 473CC(2) of the Act on referral of that refusal under section 473CA of the Act (other than a decision to remit the application to the Minister for reconsideration)—35 days after the Immigration Assessment Authority makes the decision; or
Omit “28 days”, substitute “35 days”.
Insert:
(1A) For the purposes of subparagraph (1)(a)(ii) and paragraphs (1)(b), (ba) and (bb), the 35 day period begins to run:
(a) despite any failure to comply with the requirements of the Act or these Regulations in relation to the decision mentioned in the paragraph or subparagraph; and
(b) irrespective of the validity of the decision.
Insert:
(1) The amendments of these Regulations made by Schedule 1 to the
Migration Legislation Amendment (2016 Measures No. 5) Regulation 2016 apply in relation to an application for a visa made on or after 19 November 2016.(2) To avoid doubt, an instrument in force under subregulation 2.07(5) immediately before 19 November 2016 continues in force on and after that day regardless of the amendments of that subregulation made by Schedule 1 to the
Migration Legislation Amendment (2016 Measures No. 5) Regulation 2016 .
The amendments of these Regulations made by Schedule 2 to the
Migration Legislation Amendment (2016 Measures No. 5) Regulation 2016 apply in relation to a bridging visa granted on or after 19 November 2016.
0
0
0