Miglani (Migration)
[2023] AATA 3173
•26 September 2023
Miglani (Migration) [2023] AATA 3173 (26 September 2023)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Mr Sunny Miglani
CASE NUMBER: 2312901
HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S): BCC2020/2215289
MEMBER:Peter Papadopoulos
DATE:26 September 2023
PLACE OF DECISION: Sydney
DECISION:The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.
Statement made on 26 September 2023 at 12:22pm
CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa – Subclass 485 (Temporary Graduate) – repeat application – No jurisdictionLEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 65
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), rr 4.10, 4.13CASES
Jayasinghe v MIEA (1997) 76 FCR 301
SZASP v MIAC [2007] FCA 771
SZBWJ v MIAC [2008] FMCA 164STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision of a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 1 June 2023 to refuse to grant a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act).
The review application was lodged with the Tribunal on 24 August 2023. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has found that it has no jurisdiction to review the decision.
An application for review of the same delegate’s decision was previously made to the Tribunal. The Tribunal made a decision on that application on 13 July 2023. Where the Tribunal has received a valid application for review of a reviewable decision and carried out its statutory duty to review the decision under the Act, the decision is no longer a reviewable decision: SZBWJ v MIAC [2008] FMCA 164 at [41] and the cases cited therein. The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to review a delegate’s decision twice: Jayasinghe v MIEA (1997) 76 FCR 301 and SZASP v MIAC [2007] FCA 771.
On 7 September 2023, the Tribunal wrote to the applicant and informed him that it appeared the application was not a valid application as a review of the same decision had been previously made to the Tribunal on 6 June 2023. The case number for that first application is 2307990. The Tribunal made a decision on that application on 13 July 2023 and found that the other application was not a valid application and the Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to conduct a review. It is noted that three further applications in relation to the same delegate’s decision were also finalised with the same outcome on 13 July 2023 - case numbers 2308376, 2308379, and 2308386. The applicant was invited to comment on whether a valid application had been made by 21 September 2023. No response has been received.
As the delegate’s decision has already been the subject of a valid review by the Tribunal, it is no longer a reviewable decision. Accordingly, the Tribunal no longer has jurisdiction in relation to that decision.
DECISION
The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in this matter.
Peter Papadopoulos
Member
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Judicial Review
-
Res Judicata
0
3
0