Middleton v Parramatta City Council
Case
•
[1999] NSWCA 469
•17 December 1999
No judgment structure available for this case.
CITATION: Middleton v Parramatta City Council [1999] NSWCA 469 FILE NUMBER(S): CA 40373/98 HEARING DATE(S): Written submissions JUDGMENT DATE:
17 December 1999PARTIES :
Jack Middleton
(Appellant)
v
Parramatta City Council
(Respondent)JUDGMENT OF: Priestley JA at 1; Stein JA at 1; Fitzgerald JA at 1
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 3388/94 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER: Twigg DCJ
COUNSEL: A: Mr J L Sharpe
R: Mr M McCullochSOLICITORS: A: Steve Masselos & Co
R: Phillips FoxCATCHWORDS: Costs DECISION: Appellant pay respondent's costs of the appeal.
THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40373/98
DC 3388/94
PRIESTLEY JA
STEIN JA
FITZGERALD JA
FRIDAY 17 DECEMBER 1999Jack MIDDLETON v PARRAMATTA CITY COUNCIL (No.2)
JUDGMENT ON COSTS
1 THE COURT: This appeal was dismissed on 8 December 1999. 2 The usual order would be that costs follow the event. The appellant opposes that course. 3 Shortly stated, he advanced two reasons. One is that leave to appeal was granted and the other is that he had offered to settle the appeal on the basis that a verdict be entered for the respondent but each party pay his or its own costs. The appellant did not offer to pay the respondent’s costs up to that time. 4 It is regrettable that more costs have been thrown away in making these submissions, which are without merit. 5 The appellant must pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal.
**********
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0