| [2025] FWCA 162 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Michael Shorter
(AG2024/4983)
TASMANIAN INDEPENDENT CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS (TEACHERS) MULTI ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025
| Educational services | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT O’NEILL | MELBOURNE, 16 JANUARY 2025 |
Application for approval of the Tasmanian Independent Christian Schools (Teachers) Multi Enterprise Agreement 2025
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Tasmanian Independent Christian Schools (Teachers) Multi Enterprise Agreement 2025 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Michael Shorter. The Agreement is a single multi-enterprise agreement.
The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the agreement.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Employer provided a pre-reform version of the NERR to employees. Pursuant to s.188(5), I am satisfied that the Agreement would have been genuinely agreed to but for this minor procedural error. I am satisfied that the employees covered by the agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the error. Accordingly, I exercise the discretion conferred by s.188(5) of the Act.
The Independent Education Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
I observe that the following provision is likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):
· Clause 58.3 - Substitute Days.
However, noting clause 9 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 23 January 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2028.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE527624 PR783362>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Michael Shorter [2025] FWCA 162
- Case
- [2025] FWCA 162
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to decide whether the proposed agreement was genuinely a multi-enterprise agreement within the meaning of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it met the criteria for approval, including that it provided for fair and efficient industrial relations outcomes. Additionally, the court examined whether the agreement had been fairly and genuinely negotiated, whether it contained provisions that were consistent with the public interest, and if it complied with the legislative requirements for approval.
In reaching its decision, the Commission considered the evidence and submissions presented by both parties. The Commission found that the proposed agreement was genuinely a multi-enterprise agreement and that it had been negotiated in good faith. The agreement provided for fair and efficient industrial relations outcomes, contained provisions consistent with the public interest, and complied with all necessary legislative requirements. The Commission approved the application, confirming the validity and enforceability of the agreement.
The Fair Work Commission approved the application for the Tasmanian Independent Christian Schools (Teachers) Multi Enterprise Agreement 2025, recognising it as a valid and enforceable agreement. The decision effectively sets the employment terms and conditions for teachers within the specified schools for the duration of the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.