Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION: Michael Davies Associates Pty Ltd & Anor v South Sydney Municipal Council [1989] NSWLEC 179 PARTIES: APPLICANT
RESPONDENT
Michael Davies Associates Pty Ltd
South Sydney Municipal CouncilFILE NUMBER(S): 10284 of 1985 CORAM: Stein J KEY ISSUES: :- LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning And Assessment Act CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: DATE OF JUDGMENT:
04/17/1989LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
JUDGMENT:
HIS HONOUR: This matter concerns an application to modify a consent under s.102 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act. It was heard immediately following No. 40094 of 1989, in respect of which I have just published my Judgment. Since I have held in the Class 4 proceeding that the purported extension of the consent by the City Commissioners, (which consent is now sought to be modified), is a nullity and that the subject consent lapsed on 2 January 1988, the modification application must necessarily fail.
In these circumstances there is no point in me considering the merits of the s.102 application and I decline to do so. The application is dismissed with each party to bear its own costs. The exhibits may be returned.
- AGLC
- Michael Davies Associates Pty Ltd v South Sydney Municipal Council [1989] NSWLEC 179
- Case
- [1989] NSWLEC 179
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issue the court had to decide was whether the modification application could proceed given that the court had previously ruled the extension of the consent by the City Commissioners to be a nullity. This ruling meant that the consent had lapsed on 2 January 1988. The court needed to determine if it should consider the merits of the modification application in light of this finding. The court also needed to decide whether the application should be dismissed and who should bear the costs of the proceedings.
In delivering the judgment, the court noted that since the extension of the consent was found to be a nullity, the consent had effectively lapsed. As a result, the modification application was necessarily bound to fail. The court declined to consider the merits of the application and dismissed it. The court also ordered that each party bear its own costs and that the exhibits be returned. The ruling underscores the importance of the procedural validity of consents in environmental planning and assessment matters.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.