Michael Aaron James (by his next friend Rhonda Dawn James) v Grant

Case

[2009] WADC 201 (S)

22 DECEMBER 2009

No judgment structure available for this case.

MICHAEL AARON JAMES (by his next friend RHONDA DAWN JAMES) -v- GRANT [2009] WADC 201 (S)
Last Update:  27/01/2010
MICHAEL AARON JAMES (by his next friend RHONDA DAWN JAMES) -v- GRANT [2009] WADC 201 (S)
Jurisdiction: DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   Citation No: [2009] WADC 201 (S)
Case No: CIV:56/2006   Heard: 2-5, 8-12, 15 & 17 JUNE 2009
Coram: MAZZA DCJ   Delivered: 22/12/2009
Location: PERTH   Supplementary Decision: 22/01/2010
No of Pages: 4   Judgment Part: 1 of 1
Result: Plaintiff awarded damages in the sum of $7,448,455.61
[Click here for Judgment in Adobe Acrobat Format ]
Parties: MICHAEL AARON JAMES (by his next friend RHONDA DAWN JAMES)
CLAIRE REBECCA GRANT

Catchwords: Damages calculated
Legislation: Nil

Case References: James v Grant [2009] WADC 201



JURISDICTION : DISTRICT COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

                  IN CIVIL
LOCATION : PERTH CITATION : MICHAEL AARON JAMES (by his next friend RHONDA DAWN JAMES) -v- GRANT [2009] WADC 201 (S) CORAM : MAZZA DCJ HEARD : 2-5, 8-12, 15 & 17 JUNE 2009 DELIVERED : 22 DECEMBER 2009

SUPPLEMENTARY
DECISION : 22 JANUARY 2010 FILE NO/S : CIV 56 of 2006 BETWEEN : MICHAEL AARON JAMES (by his next friend RHONDA DAWN JAMES)
                  Plaintiff

                  AND

                  CLAIRE REBECCA GRANT
                  Defendant

Catchwords:

Damages calculated

Legislation:

Nil

(Page 2)

Result:

Plaintiff awarded damages in the sum of $7,448,455.61

Representation:

Counsel:


    Plaintiff : Mr T Lampropoulos SC & Mr M E Herron
    Defendant : Mr D R Clyne

Solicitors:

    Plaintiff : Donna Percy & Co
    Defendant : K N Allan


Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):

James v Grant [2009] WADC 201


(Page 3)

1 MAZZA DCJ: On 22 December 2009 I published reasons and made findings of fact. I gave the parties the opportunity to consider those reasons and make calculations, where necessary, in accordance with my findings: James v Grant [2009] WADC 201.

2 The parties' legal representatives have agreed, based on my findings, that judgment should be entered for the plaintiff against the defendant in the sum of $7,448,455.61. That figure is made up as follows:

MICHAEL JAMES22 years
ScheduleJUDGMENT
Past & Future Economic Loss & Superannuation
350,000.00
Past Gratuitous Services (with amended interest of $134,036.53 as at 22/1/2010)
489,194.26
Future Gratuitous Services
31,961.80
Future Medical Expenses
219,630.11
Prescriptions
25,090.66
MRSA
3,131.48
Vitamins and minerals
26,145.27
Oxygen etc
245,167.71
Future Equipment Expenses
118,813.46
Future Thickened Fluids
59,355.78
Bladder and Bowel Requirements
68,837.50
Future Attendant Care incl domestic assistance (incl for Carer Travel of $50,951.25)
4,420,213.77
Housing Modifications (incl Maintenance of $72,787.50)
307,042.50
Extraordinary Holiday Expenses
60,000.00
Motor Vehicle Expenses
146,111.81
Past Travelling Expenses
10,420.90
Travelling Expenses – 'Wilson v McLeay'
3,238.20
Special Damages
184,100.40
Increased Utility Expenses
3,000.00
Trustees Fees
350,000.00
General Damages
327,000.00
TOTAL
7,448,455.61

(Page 4)

3 With respect to the question of costs, I have made an order that the defendant pay the plaintiff's costs of the action to be assessed. The plaintiff wishes to apply for special costs orders. Failing agreement, I will resolve this issue in due course.


 |   | 
Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

1