NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: MGC [2023] NSWCATGD 12 Hearing dates: 3 May 2023 Date of orders: 3 May 2023 Decision date: 03 May 2023 Jurisdiction: Guardianship Division Before: S Barnes, Senior Member (Legal)
M Ellensohn, Senior Member (Professional)
F N Given, General Member (Community)Decision: Guardianship
1. A guardianship order is made for MGC.
2. The Public Guardian is appointed as the guardian.
3. This is a continuing guardianship order for a period of six months from 3 May 2023.
4. This is a limited guardianship order giving the guardian(s) custody of MGC to the extent necessary to carry out the functions below.
FUNCTIONS:
5. The guardian has the following functions:
a) Accommodation
To decide where MGC may reside.
b) Health care
To decide what health care MGC may receive.
c) Medical/Dental consent
To make substitute decisions about proposed minor or major medical or dental treatment, where MGC is not capable of giving a valid consent.
d) Services
To make decisions about services to be provided to MGC.
CONDITION:
6. The condition of this order is:
a) Standard Condition
In exercising this role the guardian shall take all reasonable steps to bring MGC to an understanding of the issues and to obtain and consider her views before making significant decisions.
Financial Management
Today’s hearing of NZT’s financial management application is adjourned to a day to be confirmed by the registry.
Catchwords: GUARDIANSHIP – application for a guardianship order – whether a guardianship order should be made – 52-year-old subject person with intellectual and physical disabilities – subject person a long-term resident in an aged care facility – NDIS participant – limited contact with family members – concerns about high level of neglect – reported use of psychotropic medication by the aged care facility without informed consent – need for accommodation decisions – need for decisions to be made about NDIS funded services – need for decisions in relation to medical and dental consent – proposed private guardian not suitable to be appointed – Public Guardian appointed – order made
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT – application for a financial management order – consideration of sections 36 and 38 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 – consideration of s 4 of the Guardianship Act 1987 – hearing adjourned
Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), ss 36(1), 38(5)-(6), 51
Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW), ss 3(1)-(2), 4, 14(1)-(2), 15(3), 17, 17(1)(a)-(c)
Cases Cited: C S and M Y v the Guardianship Tribunal and the Public Guardian (Supreme Court (NSW), Windeyer J, 29 November 1999, unrep)
P v D1 & Ors [2011] NSWSC 257
Re B [2011] NSWSC 1075
Texts Cited: None cited.
Category: Principal judgment Parties: 001: Guardianship Application
MGC (the person)
NZT (applicant)
KAC (carer)
OYC (joined party)
Public Guardian003: Financial Management Application
MGC (the person)
NZT (applicant)
KAC (carer)
OYC (joined party)
NSW Trustee and Guardian004: Financial Management Application
MGC (the person)
OYC (applicant)
KAC (carer)
NSW Trustee and Guardian
Continue reading MGC
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- MGC [2023] NSWCATGD 12
- Case
- [2023] NSWCATGD 12
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved determining whether a guardianship order should be made for the subject person. The court had to consider the nature and extent of the guardianship required, including decisions about accommodation, health care, medical and dental consent, and services. Additionally, the court needed to assess the suitability of the proposed guardian. The court also had to consider an application for a financial management order, examining sections 36 and 38 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 and section 4 of the Guardianship Act 1987. The hearing for the financial management application was adjourned.
The court found that a guardianship order was necessary to address the significant needs of the subject person. Given the concerns about neglect and the need for informed consent in medical and dental decisions, the court appointed the Public Guardian as the guardian. The order included specific functions such as deciding on accommodation, health care, and medical and dental consent. The court also imposed a condition requiring the guardian to take reasonable steps to involve the subject person in decision-making processes. Regarding the financial management application, the hearing was adjourned to a later date to be confirmed by the registry.
Orders
Orders of the court
Guardianship
1. A guardianship order is made for MGC.
2. The Public Guardian is appointed as the guardian.
3. This is a continuing guardianship order for a period of six months from 3 May 2023.
4. This is a limited guardianship order giving the guardian(s) custody of MGC to the extent necessary to carry out the functions below.
FUNCTIONS:
5. The guardian has the following functions:
a) Accommodation
To decide where MGC may reside.
b) Health care
To decide what health care MGC may receive.
c) Medical/Dental consent
To make substitute decisions about proposed minor or major medical or dental treatment, where MGC is not capable of giving a valid consent.
d) Services
To make decisions about services to be provided to MGC.
CONDITION:
6. The condition of this order is:
a) Standard Condition
In exercising this role the guardian shall take all reasonable steps to bring MGC to an understanding of the issues and to obtain and consider her views before making significant decisions.
Financial Management
Today’s hearing of NZT’s financial management application is adjourned to a day to be confirmed by the registry.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.