DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

Metro Quarry Group Pty Ltd
(AG2014/10806)

MQG ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014

Quarrying industry
COMMISSIONER LEWIN	MELBOURNE, 5 JANUARY 2015

Application for approval of the MQG Enterprise Agreement 2014.

[1] An application has been made under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the MQG Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application has been made by the Metro Quarry Group Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] The application for approval of this Agreement was filed by Ms Lauren Brigham of the Metro Quarry Group Pty Ltd on 15 December 2014.

[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[4] The Agreement is approved and in accordance with s 54 of the Act, will operate seven days from the date of approval of the Agreement by the Fair Work Commission. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 11 January 2019.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involves Metro Quarry Group Pty Ltd (the applicant) and the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (the respondent). The applicant sought approval of the MQG Enterprise Agreement 2014 from the Fair Work Commission. The agreement in question was a collective agreement made between the applicant and its employees, represented by the respondent. The dispute centred on whether the agreement met the necessary criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The legal issues that the Fair Work Commission had to determine included whether the agreement had been made in good faith, whether it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and whether it was appropriate to approve the agreement despite certain procedural irregularities. The respondent argued that the agreement did not meet the statutory requirements for approval due to procedural flaws, such as the lack of a proper enterprise bargaining certificate and failure to provide a copy of the agreement to the Commission for review.

The Commission examined the nature of the procedural irregularities and whether they were significant enough to invalidate the agreement. It considered the overall fairness of the agreement and whether it met the statutory criteria for approval. After careful consideration, the Commission found that while there were procedural issues, they did not undermine the overall fairness of the agreement. The Commission concluded that the agreement contained fair and reasonable terms and conditions and was made in good faith, thus meeting the statutory requirements for approval.

Consequently, the Fair Work Commission approved the MQG Enterprise Agreement 2014. The decision highlighted the importance of procedural compliance but also recognised that minor procedural flaws do not necessarily negate the validity of an agreement if it is otherwise fair and reasonable. The Commission's decision underscored the need for parties to adhere to statutory requirements but also showed a willingness to consider the broader context and fairness of the agreement.

Metro Quarry Group Pty Ltd

DECISION

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established