Metcash Food & Grocery Pty Ltd T/A IGA Fresh

Case [2014] FWCA 2515


[2014] FWCA 2515

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Metcash Food & Grocery Pty Ltd T/A IGA Fresh
(AG2014/4098)

METCASH FOOD & GROCERY FRESH PRODUCE DISTRIBUTION CENTRE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014

Storage services

COMMISSIONER ROE

MELBOURNE, 14 APRIL 2014

Application for approval of the Metcash Food & Grocery Fresh Produce Distribution Centre Enterprise Agreement 2014.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Metcash Food & Grocery Fresh Produce Distribution Centre Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Metcash Food & Grocery Pty Ltd T/A IGA Fresh (the Applicant). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I was initially concerned with some aspects of the proposed Agreement and wrote to the company outlining those issues on 7 April 2014. On 8 April 2014 I received a signed undertaking in response to the queries from Ms Lynette Borovica, State Human Resources Manager WA at the Applicant. This undertaking now forms part of the Agreement and is kept on the file. A copy of the undertaking should be circulated to all employees and attached to all copies of the agreement subsequently produced or used by the parties.

[3] The undertaking which now forms part of the Agreement is attached.

[4] I am satisfied that the effect of the undertaking is not likely to cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement; or result in substantial changes to the Agreement. Acceptance of the undertaking is consistent with the object of Part 2-4 of the Act to facilitate the making of agreements. The bargaining representatives that the Fair Work Commission is aware of have been consulted and support the undertaking.

[5] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer however taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[6] The Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[7] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 21 April 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 2 January 2017.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE407715  PR549694>

Details
AGLC
Metcash Food & Grocery Pty Ltd T/A IGA Fresh [2014] FWCA 2515
Case
[2014] FWCA 2515
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Metcash Food & Grocery Pty Ltd, trading as IGA Fresh, applied for the approval of the Metcash Food & Grocery Fresh Produce Distribution Centre Enterprise Agreement 2014. The application was brought before the Fair Work Commission. The dispute centred on whether the proposed enterprise agreement, which aimed to regulate the employment conditions for workers in fresh produce distribution centres, complied with the requirements set out in the Fair Work Act 2009.

The legal issues the court had to address involved verifying whether the agreement met the statutory criteria for approval, such as ensuring it did not adversely affect employees' minimum rights and entitlements. The court also examined whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated and whether it complied with procedural requirements, including the provision of necessary information to employees and the availability of independent advice. The court's reasoning focused on the interpretation of the Fair Work Act and relevant case law to assess the agreement's compliance with statutory provisions. It was determined that the agreement did not unjustifiably prejudice the minimum standards of pay and conditions, and it was evident that the necessary procedural steps had been followed. The court concluded that the agreement was appropriately negotiated and met all the criteria for approval.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Metcash Food & Grocery Fresh Produce Distribution Centre Enterprise Agreement 2014, finding that it complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The decision confirmed that the agreement was appropriately negotiated and did not negatively impact the minimum rights and conditions of employees. The approval of the agreement was a significant step in formalising the employment conditions for workers in the fresh produce distribution sector.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.