Meriton Apartments Pty Limited v City of Canada Bay Council

Case

[2003] NSWLEC 92

02/18/2003

No judgment structure available for this case.

>

Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: Meriton Apartments Pty Limited v City of Canada Bay Council [2003] NSWLEC 92
PARTIES:

APPLICANT
Meriton Apartments Pty Limited

RESPONDENT
City of Canada Bay Council
FILE NUMBER(S): 10576 of 2002
CORAM: Talbot J
KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- condition requiring restriction as to user approved
LEGISLATION CITED:
CASES CITED:
DATES OF HEARING: 18/02/2003
EX TEMPORE
JUDGMENT DATE :

02/18/2003
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:


APPLICANT
Mr S Simington (Solicitor)
SOLICITORS
Abbott Tout

RESPONDENT
Mr R Graham (Solicitor)
SOLICITORS
Phillips Fox


JUDGMENT:

IN THE LAND AND


ENVIRONMENT COURT


OF NEW SOUTH WALES

                          10576 of 2002

                          Talbot J

                          18 February 2003
Meriton Apartments Pty Limited
                                  Applicant
      v
City of Canada Bay Council
                                  Respondent
Judgment

      Introduction

1 HIS HONOUR: A s 88B instrument is needed in this case. I should place this on the record because there is a condition of consent to the effect that there shall never be development on the area of the rock outcrop. Not only will there be the impediment of the condition, which would operate to prevent such development during the life of the development consent itself, there will also be an impediment on the title to the land which perpetuates the constraint. If any subsequent owner lodges a development application it will not be just a question of overcoming the existing consent condition but the circumstances will require the restriction as to user to be changed. In my view this is an appropriate case where a restriction as to user can be recognised as a means of reinforcing a condition of a development consent in perpetuity. That being the objective.

2 Notwithstanding the Court’s policy, if that is what it is, in generally not favouring the imposition of a restriction as to user merely as a means of reinforcing a condition of development consent, I specifically approve the restriction in these circumstances.

3 I make order No.1 in the form of consent orders dated 17 February 2003 and I make order No. 2 in the following form:-

          DA205/02 for the construction of two residential apartment buildings is determined by the grant of consent subject to the conditions, which I will annex to the orders and comprised in exhibit A.
Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0