Melissa Gugiatti v iKOU

Case

[2013] FWC 5620

3 SEPTEMBER 2013

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2013] FWC 5620

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Melissa Gugiatti
v
iKOU
(U2013/504)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOOLEY

MELBOURNE, 3 SEPTEMBER 2013

Application dismissed pursuant to s.399A of the Fair Work Act 2009.

[1] On 21 February 2013, an application pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for remedy from unfair dismissal was lodged by Ms Melissa Gugiatti. Ms Gugiatti’s employment had been terminated by iKOU on 1 February 2013.

[2] iKOU made an objection to Ms Gugiatti’s application. Consequently, directions were issued and the matter was listed for hearing.

[3] Ms Gugiatti was directed to file an outline of submissions, witness statements and other documentary material she wished to rely on by noon, 24 June 2013. The directions were not complied with and the matter subsequently proceeded to a non compliance hearing before me on 28 June 2013.

[4] Ms Gugiatti failed to attend the non compliance hearing. At the hearing, iKOU made an oral application, pursuant to s.399A of the Act, that the matter be dismissed as Ms Gugiatti had failed to comply with the direction of the Commission. I waived compliance with the Fair Work Rules 2009 and accepted iKOU’s oral application.

[5] Ms Gugiatti was sent correspondence informing her of iKOU’s s.399A application. Ms Gugiatti was directed to file submissions and other documentary material in respect of iKOU’s application. Ms Gugiatti was advised that if she failed to comply with this direction, her application would be dismissed.

[6] Ms Gugiatti did not file any material with the Commission.

[7] Section 399A of the Act provides as follows:

399A Dismissing applications

    (1) The FWC may, subject to subsection (2), dismiss an application for an order under Division 4 if the FWC is satisfied that the applicant has unreasonably:

      (a) failed to attend a conference conducted by the FWC, or a hearing held by the FWC, in relation to the application; or

      (b) failed to comply with a direction or order of the FWC relating to the application; or

      (c) failed to discontinue the application after a settlement agreement has been concluded.

    Note 1: For another power of the FWC to dismiss applications for orders under Division 4, see section 587.

    Note 2: The FWC may make an order for costs if the applicant’s failure causes the other party to the matter to incur costs (see section 400A).

    (2) The FWC may exercise its power under subsection (1) on application by the employer.

    (3) This section does not limit when the FWC may dismiss an application.

[8] Section 593 of the Act provides that the Commission is not required to hold a hearing except as provided by the Act.

[9] As Ms Gugiatti did not file any material in opposition to the application to dismiss, I have decided to determine the application on the papers.

[10] After considering all the material, I have decided to dismiss Ms Gugiatti’s application for remedy from unfair dismissal. An order giving effect to this decision will be issued today.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR540106>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0