Meeta and Sibi

In the matter of *Meeta and Sibi*, heard before Cronin J, the parties presented a dispute for resolution. The precise nature of the dispute is not detailed in the provided text, but the court's orders indicate it involved matters requiring the court's formal determination and the creation of minutes of proposed orders.

The court was required to consider and make orders in accordance with the parties' agreed minutes of proposed orders, specifically referencing paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 6 to 9, as well as paragraphs 4 and 5 of those minutes. Furthermore, the court was tasked with certifying the reasonableness of engaging counsel to attend, pursuant to Order 19.50 of the *Family Law Rules 2004*.

The court's reasoning and the legal principles applied are not explicitly set out in the provided text, beyond the fact that the orders were made by consent. This suggests the court accepted the parties' agreed resolution as presented in the minutes of proposed orders. The court's certification regarding the engagement of counsel indicates an assessment of the necessity and appropriateness of legal representation in the proceedings.

The court made orders by consent in accordance with the specified paragraphs of the minutes of proposed orders, which were sealed and attached to the court file. The court also directed that these minutes remain on the court file and certified that it was reasonable to engage counsel to attend the proceedings.