Medovarski v Rickards

Case

[2008] FMCA 1531

10 November 2008


FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

MEDOVARSKI v RICKARDS [2008] FMCA 1531
BANKRUPTCY – Application to review decision of registrar refusing to set aside a bankruptcy notice – application for an adjournment – adjournment refused.
Applicant: ZLATKO MEDOVARSKI
Respondent: MICHAEL RICKARDS
File Number: MLG 1113 of 2008
Judgment of: Riley FM
Hearing date: 10 November 2008
Date of Last Submission: 10 November 2008
Delivered at: Melbourne
Delivered on: 10 November 2008

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: In person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr O.N. Scoullar-Grieg
Solicitors for the Respondent: Rickards Legal

ORDERS

  1. The applicant’s application for an adjournment is refused.

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
MELBOURNE

MLG 1113 of 2008

ZLATKO MEDOVARSKI

Applicant

And

MICHAEL RICKARDS

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

(Revised from transcript)

  1. The applicant has brought an application for review of a decision of the Registrar made on 29 September 2008.  By that decision the Registrar dismissed an application seeking to set aside a bankruptcy notice that had been served on the applicant. 

  2. The application for review was listed for hearing before the court today.  The applicant now seeks an adjournment of his application so that he can get legal assistance.  He told the court that he has tried strenuously to get publicly funded legal assistance but he has been unsuccessful.  He also said that he has made inquiries of Slater and Gordon to try and gain some assistance through private solicitors. 

  3. The applicant said that Slater and Gordon are still considering the matter.  He said that Slater and Gordon would let him know “in due course”.  Slater and Gordon have not appeared to assist the applicant today.  They have not provided a letter saying that they are in the process of considering whether they can assist him. 

  4. There is also material before the court filed by the applicant himself which says that he is in difficult financial circumstances.  He is a pensioner and he has health problems.  He indicated that he has little financial means to be able to fund legal assistance.

  5. In all the circumstances, I do not consider that the applicant has any realistic possibility of obtaining legal assistance.  Accordingly, I do not consider that it is appropriate to adjourn this proceeding for the purpose of the applicant obtaining legal assistance.

I certify that the preceding five (5) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Riley FM

Associate:  Alexandra Sidoti

Date:  15 November 2008

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0