Mechanical Maintenance Solutions (Australia) Pty Ltd

Case [2024] FWCA 3260


[2024] FWCA 3260

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Mechanical Maintenance Solutions (Australia) Pty Ltd

(AG2024/3012)

MMSA NATIONAL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024

Manufacturing and associated industries

COMMISSIONER MIRABELLA

MELBOURNE, 18 SEPTEMBER 2024

Application for approval of the MMSA National Enterprise Agreement 2024.

  1. Mechanical Maintenance Solutions (Australia) Pty Ltd (the Employer) has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the MMSA National Enterprise Agreement 2024 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the FW Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 (Cth) made a number of changes to enterprise agreement approval processes in Part 2-4 of the FW Act, that commenced operation on 6 June 2023. The notification time for the Agreement was 3 July 2024 and the Agreement was made on 26 July 2024. Accordingly, both the genuine agreement and the better off overall test requirements are those applying on and from 6 June 2023.

  1. On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of sections 186, 187 and 188, as are relevant to this application for approval, has been met.

  1. I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (the NES):

  • Clause 1.7.6(iii): Redundancy
  • Clause 5.2.4: Public holiday substitution
  1. However, noting clause 1.3.3 of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The Agreement was approved on 18 September 2024 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 25 September 2024. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 25 September 2028.

Variation

  1. The Employer notified the Fair Work Commission of a typographical error in the wages table of Appendix 1 of the Agreement and requested that this error be corrected. The Employer advised that the 1 July 2026 rate for MMSA3 employees of $57.51 should be $47.51. On 22 August 2024, my chambers invited the parties to provide submissions as to whether this is an obvious error, irregularity or defect pursuant to s.218A of the FW Act.

  1. On 26 August 2024, the Employer provided a revised copy of the wage table on page 32 of the Agreement and submitted that the wage table should be read in conjunction with clause 1(a) of Appendix 1 which specifies a 4% year on year increase in rates of pay and that $57.51 does not represent a 4% increase of the preceding value of $45.68. The Employer further submitted that the 4% wage increase per annum was explained to all employees.  

  1. The views of the bargaining representatives regarding the proposed amendment of the Agreement were sought, but no response was received by the deadline of 12 September 2024. 

  1. I am satisfied this error is an obvious error, defect or irregularity. I order, pursuant to s.218A of the FW Act, that the Agreement be varied to correct this error by deleting the amount ‘$57.51’ from column 5 of row 6 in the hourly rates of pay table in Appendix 1 on page 32 of the Agreement and replacing it with ‘$47.51’.

  1. The variation will operate from 25 September 2024.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE526069  PR779233>

Details
AGLC
Mechanical Maintenance Solutions (Australia) Pty Ltd [2024] FWCA 3260
Case
[2024] FWCA 3260
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Mechanical Maintenance Solutions (Australia) Pty Ltd was the subject of an application before the Fair Work Commission, seeking approval for the MMSA National Enterprise Agreement 2024. The parties involved included Mechanical Maintenance Solutions (Australia) Pty Ltd, as the employer, and various trade unions representing the employees. The nature of the dispute centred around the terms and conditions of employment as outlined in the proposed enterprise agreement. The court was tasked with determining whether the agreement met the necessary legal criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The legal issues before the court included whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and if it complied with the procedural requirements for enterprise agreements. The court had to consider if the agreement was genuinely negotiated and if it included adequate provisions for employee entitlements, such as wages, hours of work, and other conditions. Additionally, the court examined whether the agreement adhered to the Fair Work (Registered Organisations) Act 2009 and the Fair Work Regulations 2009.

The Fair Work Commission, after careful consideration of the arguments and evidence presented, found that the MMSA National Enterprise Agreement 2024 met the necessary criteria for approval. The court held that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and it was genuinely negotiated. The agreement was deemed to comply with all relevant statutory requirements, including the Fair Work Act 2009 and associated regulations. Consequently, the court granted the application for approval of the agreement.

In light of the court's decision, the Fair Work Commission approved the MMSA National Enterprise Agreement 2024. The agreement was to be implemented as a binding enterprise agreement, effective from the date of approval. The court's final orders included the formal approval of the agreement, mandating its enforcement by the employer and the relevant trade unions. The decision underscored the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements meet the statutory criteria for fairness and reasonableness in employment terms and conditions.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.