Meatheringham v Gateway Redhead Operations Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 12 min read

Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Meatheringham v Gateway Redhead Operations Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCATCD 13
Hearing dates: 19 January 2018
Date of orders: 11 April 2018
Decision date: 11 April 2018
Jurisdiction:Consumer and Commercial Division
Before: K Ross, Senior Member
Decision:

(1)   The claimed increase in site fees of $6.50 per week is excessive.

 

(2)   The amount of the increase is reduced to the amount determined by application of the following formula:

 

(a)   Increase equals site fee at date of notice x 2.4%

 

(3)   The site fees for each affected home owner must not exceed the amount calculated by application of the formula in order 2, from 1 September 2017 until 31 August 2018.

 (4)   This order applies to all affected home owners in the community (other than those who opt out).
Catchwords: RESIDENTIAL (LAND LEASE) COMMUNITIES – rent increase – excessive rent increase
Legislation Cited: Residential (Land Lease) Communities Act 2013
Category:Principal judgment
Parties:

Pam Meatheringham (Applicant)

  Gateway Redhead Operations Pty Ltd (Respondent)
Representation:

The applicant in person

  Ben O’Brien for the respondent
File Number(s): RC 17/34626
Publication restriction: unrestricted

Reasons for decision

  1. By notice dated 29 June 2017 given to each of the home owners in the respondent’s park, the respondent gave notice of an intended increase in site fees of $6.50 for each site, to commence from 1 September 2017. The home owners who are participants in these proceedings objected to the increase. Mediation was attempted but was unsuccessful and this application was lodged pursuant to s 71 of the Act. The applicants (“home owners”) seek an order that the rent increase is excessive. The respondent (“operator”) opposes the order sought.

  2. Section 67 of the Residential (Land Lease) Communities Act 2013 (“the Act”) provides as follows:

67 INCREASE OF SITE FEES BY NOTICE

(1) This section applies to a site agreement that provides for the increase of the site fees by notice (otherwise than by a fixed method).

(2) An increase in the site fees is not payable unless the fees are increased in accordance with this section.

(3) The site fees must not be increased except by notice in writing given to all the home owners in the same community at the same time under site agreements to which this section applies.

(4) The notice must:

(a) specify the amount of the increased site fees, and

(b) specify the day (the "effective day" ) on and from which the increased site fees are payable, and

(c) include an explanation for the increase, and

(d) include such other information as may be prescribed by the regulations, and

(e) be in the approved form (if any).

(5) The day specified as the effective day must not be earlier than 60 days after the day on which the notice was given.

(6) Site fees must not be increased more than once in any 12-month period under this section. This is calculated by reference to the day from which the increased site fees…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Meatheringham v Gateway Redhead Operations Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2018] NSWCATCD 13
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Meatheringham v Gateway Redhead Operations Pty Ltd, the dispute arose from a proposed increase in site fees by the defendant, Gateway Redhead Operations Pty Ltd, for residential land leases within a community. The plaintiff, Meatheringham, contested the increase, arguing it was excessive and not in line with the terms of the lease agreements. The case was heard in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT), which was tasked with determining the legitimacy of the proposed increase.

The primary legal issue before the tribunal was whether the proposed site fee increase of $6.50 per week was justified and, if not, what the appropriate amount of the increase should be. The tribunal needed to consider the terms of the lease agreements, the precedents set by similar cases, and the principle of proportionality in determining whether the increase was reasonable. Another key issue was the method by which the increase should be calculated if the tribunal found the proposed amount to be excessive.

The tribunal found that the proposed increase of $6.50 per week was indeed excessive, as it did not align with the escalation clauses of the leases and exceeded what could be considered reasonable. The tribunal reasoned that the increase should be calculated using a 2.4% escalation formula based on the site fee at the date of the notice, a method that was deemed more aligned with the principles of fairness and proportionality. Consequently, the tribunal ordered that the site fees for each affected homeowner must not exceed the amount calculated by applying this formula from 1 September 2017 until 31 August 2018. The order applies to all affected homeowners in the community, except those who opt out of the new fee structure.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) The claimed increase in site fees of $6.50 per week is excessive.

(2) The amount of the increase is reduced to the amount determined by application of the following formula:

(a) Increase equals site fee at date of notice x 2.4%

(3) The site fees for each affected home owner must not exceed the amount calculated by application of the formula in order 2, from 1 September 2017 until 31 August 2018.

(4) This order applies to all affected home owners in the community (other than those who opt out).

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.